wehave vs SponsorCX

wehave8.3Visit SponsorCX7.1Visit

Higher score wehave #3 in Event Sponsorship Management Software 8.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit wehave

vs

SponsorCX #6 in Event Sponsorship Management Software 7.1/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 5 features Visit SponsorCX

• wehave fits best

  Sports organizations managing rights and hospitality

• SponsorCX fits best

  Teams needing integrations and partner portals

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	wehave 8.3/10 Visit ↗	SponsorCX 7.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	8.3	7.1
Ranking	#3 in Event Sponsorship Management Software	#6 in Event Sponsorship Management Software
Best for	Sports organizations managing rights and hospitality	Teams needing integrations and partner portals
Pricing model	Free plan + paid	Paid
Starting price	Not published	Not published
Free plan	✓ (best)	Not published
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Cloud	Cloud, Mobile
Platforms	Web	Web
Integrations	9 integrations	10 integrations
Built for	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features wehave 5/5 · SponsorCX 4/5
Package management	✓ (best)	Not published
Sponsor pipeline	✓	✓
Contract management	✓	✓
Deliverable tracking	✓	✓
Sponsor reporting	✓	✓
Specs
Event formats	Not published	In-person
Our review
Pros	Free access covers CRM, rights, contracts, portals and reporting Automates hospitality invitations, guest lists and matchday check-in Connects CRM, ticketing, payment and accounting systems	Centralizes inventory, contracts, deliverables, and fulfillment Connects with Salesforce, HubSpot, QuickBooks, and more Partner Portal and mobile proof-of-performance capture
Cons	Web-only access may not suit teams needing a native mobile app Pay-per-guest pricing can make budgeting less predictable Its sports-focused breadth may exceed the needs of small one-off events	Core pricing requires a tailored sales conversation The platform is web-based, with mobile activity handled separately Its broad workflow may exceed the needs of simple programs
Our verdict	wehave is a commercial operations platform for professional sports clubs, leagues, federations and event organisers. It brings partner CRM, live inventory, rights, contracts, deliverables, hospitality, B2B ticketing, invoicing and… Read the review →	SponsorCX is a web-based platform for organizations that sell or invest in event partnerships, including sports teams, venues, universities, agencies, nonprofits, and brands. It brings contacts, inventory, assets, agreements, sales… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• wehave — where it wins

  • Free access covers CRM, rights, contracts, portals and reporting
  • Automates hospitality invitations, guest lists and matchday check-in
  • Connects CRM, ticketing, payment and accounting systems

  Where it doesn't

  • Web-only access may not suit teams needing a native mobile app
  • Pay-per-guest pricing can make budgeting less predictable
  • Its sports-focused breadth may exceed the needs of small one-off events

• SponsorCX — where it wins

  • Centralizes inventory, contracts, deliverables, and fulfillment
  • Connects with Salesforce, HubSpot, QuickBooks, and more
  • Partner Portal and mobile proof-of-performance capture

  Where it doesn't

  • Core pricing requires a tailored sales conversation
  • The platform is web-based, with mobile activity handled separately
  • Its broad workflow may exceed the needs of simple programs

• wehave8.3/10 · Free plan

  A broad partner, hospitality and ticketing platform for sports organisations.

  Visit wehaveFull verdict →
• SponsorCX7.1/10 · Pricing on request

  A broad web platform for managing partner sales, delivery, proof, and reporting.

  Visit SponsorCXFull verdict →