Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Academic Research Databases

Web of Science vs arXiv

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Web of Science #1 in Academic Research Databases 9.4/10 Pricing on request ✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Web of Science
arXiv #14 in Academic Research Databases 8.1/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 5 features Visit arXiv

Web of Science leads on 0 checks, arXiv on 1, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreWeb of Science · 9.4/10
  • Free planonly arXiv
  • Most featuresWeb of Science · 5 of 5

Web of Science scores higher on our rubric for academic research databases: 9.4 against 8.1 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #14.

arXiv offers free plan; Web of Science doesn't.

Web of Science is the better fit for institutional citation indexing. arXiv is the better fit for free scholarly paper access and APIs.

  • Web of Science fits best

    Institutional citation indexing

  • arXiv fits best

    Free scholarly paper access and APIs

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Web of Science 9.4/10 Visit ↗ arXiv 8.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 8.1
Ranking #1 in Academic Research Databases #14 in Academic Research Databases
Best for Institutional citation indexing Free scholarly paper access and APIs
Pricing model Paid Free
Starting price Pricing on request Free plan
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Live chat, Phone, Email, Docs Email, Docs
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Web of Science 5/5 · arXiv 3/5
Full-text access ✓ ✓
Advanced search ✓ ✓
Theses and dissertations ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Conference proceedings ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Institutional access ✓ ✓
Specs
Subject coverage Multidisciplinary Multidisciplinary
Content types journals, conference proceedings, scholarly books, dissertations, theses, preprints, datasets, grants, patents scholarly articles
Our review
Pros
  • Covers journals, books, conferences, theses, datasets, grants, and patents
  • Supports Boolean, proximity, fielded search, and citation tracking
  • Connects with EndNote, OpenURL, library catalogs, and ORCID
  • Free reading and submission with full-text scholarly articles
  • Advanced search and browsing across eight research areas
  • API access for machine retrieval and research workflows
Cons
  • Subscription pricing requires contacting sales
  • There is no free plan
  • Full-text access depends on holdings, subscriptions, or open-access links
  • Covers scholarly articles rather than broader research content
  • Submissions are moderated but not peer-reviewed by arXiv
  • Subject coverage is limited to eight research areas
Our verdict

Web of Science is a subscription-based academic research platform from Clarivate for researchers, students, librarians, administrators, and institutions. Its scope spans sciences, social sciences, arts, and humanities, with records…

Read the review →

arXiv is a free research-sharing platform and open-access archive for scholarly articles. It is designed for researchers and readers who need to discover, retrieve, read, submit, and distribute academic papers online. Coverage spans…

Read the review →
  1. Web of ScienceAcademic Research Databases 9.4Pricing on request
  2. arXivAcademic Research Databases 8.1Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Web of Science — where it wins

    • Covers journals, books, conferences, theses, datasets, grants, and patents
    • Supports Boolean, proximity, fielded search, and citation tracking
    • Connects with EndNote, OpenURL, library catalogs, and ORCID

    Where it doesn't

    • Subscription pricing requires contacting sales
    • There is no free plan
    • Full-text access depends on holdings, subscriptions, or open-access links

  • arXiv — where it wins

    • Free reading and submission with full-text scholarly articles
    • Advanced search and browsing across eight research areas
    • API access for machine retrieval and research workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Covers scholarly articles rather than broader research content
    • Submissions are moderated but not peer-reviewed by arXiv
    • Subject coverage is limited to eight research areas

More comparisons

All academic research databases comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update