Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Academic Research Databases

Web of Science vs ProQuest Central

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Web of Science #1 in Academic Research Databases 9.4/10 Pricing on request ✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Web of Science
ProQuest Central #2 in Academic Research Databases 9.3/10 Pricing on request ✓ 5 of 5 features Visit ProQuest

Web of Science leads on 0 checks, ProQuest Central on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreWeb of Science · 9.4/10

Web of Science scores higher on our rubric for academic research databases: 9.4 against 9.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #2.

Web of Science is the better fit for institutional citation indexing. ProQuest Central is the better fit for comprehensive institutional research access.

  • Web of Science fits best

    Institutional citation indexing

  • ProQuest Central fits best

    Comprehensive institutional research access

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Web of Science 9.4/10 Visit ↗ ProQuest Central 9.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 9.3
Ranking #1 in Academic Research Databases #2 in Academic Research Databases
Best for Institutional citation indexing Comprehensive institutional research access
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request
Free plan — Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Support Live chat, Phone, Email, Docs Docs
Integrations 4 integrations 2 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Web of Science 5/5 · ProQuest Central 5/5
Full-text access ✓ ✓
Advanced search ✓ ✓
Theses and dissertations ✓ ✓
Conference proceedings ✓ ✓
Institutional access ✓ ✓
Specs
Subject coverage Multidisciplinary Multidisciplinary
Content types journals, conference proceedings, scholarly books, dissertations, theses, preprints, datasets, grants, patents scholarly journals; trade and professional titles; newspapers; magazines; dissertations; working papers; case studies; market reports; conference papers
Our review
Pros
  • Covers journals, books, conferences, theses, datasets, grants, and patents
  • Supports Boolean, proximity, fielded search, and citation tracking
  • Connects with EndNote, OpenURL, library catalogs, and ORCID
  • Full-text coverage across multidisciplinary scholarly journals
  • Includes dissertations, reports, newspapers, and conference papers
  • AI-assisted research with ProQuest Research Assistant
Cons
  • Subscription pricing requires contacting sales
  • There is no free plan
  • Full-text access depends on holdings, subscriptions, or open-access links
  • Pricing follows a contact-sales model
  • Web access only
  • Designed for institutional rather than open access
Our verdict

Web of Science is a subscription-based academic research platform from Clarivate for researchers, students, librarians, administrators, and institutions. Its scope spans sciences, social sciences, arts, and humanities, with records…

Read the review →

ProQuest Central is a multidisciplinary academic research database for students, faculty, researchers, and libraries. It brings together full-text scholarly journals with dissertations, working papers, conference papers, case studies,…

Read the review →
  1. Web of ScienceAcademic Research Databases 9.4Pricing on request
  2. ProQuest CentralAcademic Research Databases 9.3Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Web of Science — where it wins

    • Covers journals, books, conferences, theses, datasets, grants, and patents
    • Supports Boolean, proximity, fielded search, and citation tracking
    • Connects with EndNote, OpenURL, library catalogs, and ORCID

    Where it doesn't

    • Subscription pricing requires contacting sales
    • There is no free plan
    • Full-text access depends on holdings, subscriptions, or open-access links
  • ProQuest Central — where it wins

    • Full-text coverage across multidisciplinary scholarly journals
    • Includes dissertations, reports, newspapers, and conference papers
    • AI-assisted research with ProQuest Research Assistant

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing follows a contact-sales model
    • Web access only
    • Designed for institutional rather than open access

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update