Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Task Queue Software

Trigger.dev vs Inngest

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Trigger.dev #2 in Task Queue Software 4.6/10 Free plan · paid from $10/mo Free plan✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Trigger.dev
Inngest #3 in Task Queue Software 4.6/10 Free plan · paid from $99/mo Free plan✓ 0 of 3 features Visit Inngest

Trigger.dev leads on 1 check, Inngest on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Lowest starting priceTrigger.dev · $10/mo
  • Free planboth

Trigger.dev and Inngest score identically on our rubric (4.6 out of 10) for task queue software; Trigger.dev sits at #2 and Inngest at #3 in our editorial ranking, so the choice comes down to fit.

Trigger.dev is cheaper to start at $10/mo against $99/mo.

Trigger.dev is the better fit for typeScript durable tasks with previews. Inngest is the better fit for serverless event-driven task execution.

  • Trigger.dev fits best

    TypeScript durable tasks with previews

  • Inngest fits best

    Serverless event-driven task execution

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Trigger.dev 4.6/10 Visit ↗ Inngest 4.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 4.6 4.6
Ranking #2 in Task Queue Software #3 in Task Queue Software
Best for TypeScript durable tasks with previews Serverless event-driven task execution
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $10/mo (best) $99/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Integrations 4 integrations 8 integrations
Features Trigger.dev 0/3 · Inngest 0/3
Custom retry policy Not published Not published
Scheduled jobs Not published Not published
Dead-letter queue Not published Not published
Specs
Deployment model Not published Not published
Maximum payload size Not published Not published
Official SDK languages Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Durable execution with retries, checkpointing, queues, and scheduling
  • Preview branches provide isolated environments for task development
  • Open-source deployment through managed cloud or self-hosting
  • Durable state, step retries, and memoization support reliable workflows
  • Event, cron, and webhook triggers cover varied task entry points
  • Concurrency, observability, and broad serverless integrations are included
Cons
  • Primarily targets background jobs rather than conventional HTTP serverless hosting
  • Python support runs through a Python build extension
  • Enterprise pricing uses custom discounts and plan terms
  • Runs on your own compute rather than providing a conventional hosted runtime
  • Pro starts at $99 per month for higher execution and concurrency limits
  • Advanced tracing, SAML, RBAC, and audit trails are reserved for Enterprise
Our verdict

Trigger.dev is an open-source platform for building and deploying durable background jobs, AI agents, and workflow tasks in code. It is designed for developers working with TypeScript and JavaScript, while also supporting Node.js, Bun, and…

Read the review →

Inngest is an event-driven durable execution platform for developers building background jobs, scheduled tasks, workflows, and AI applications. Functions can be written in TypeScript, Python, or Go and run on serverless, container, or…

Read the review →
  1. Trigger.devTask Queue Software 4.6Free plan · paid from $10/mo
  2. InngestTask Queue Software 4.6Free plan · paid from $99/mo

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Trigger.dev — where it wins

    • Durable execution with retries, checkpointing, queues, and scheduling
    • Preview branches provide isolated environments for task development
    • Open-source deployment through managed cloud or self-hosting

    Where it doesn't

    • Primarily targets background jobs rather than conventional HTTP serverless hosting
    • Python support runs through a Python build extension
    • Enterprise pricing uses custom discounts and plan terms

  • Inngest — where it wins

    • Durable state, step retries, and memoization support reliable workflows
    • Event, cron, and webhook triggers cover varied task entry points
    • Concurrency, observability, and broad serverless integrations are included

    Where it doesn't

    • Runs on your own compute rather than providing a conventional hosted runtime
    • Pro starts at $99 per month for higher execution and concurrency limits
    • Advanced tracing, SAML, RBAC, and audit trails are reserved for Enterprise
  • Trigger.dev4.6/10 · Free plan · paid from $10/mo

    A strong fit for durable TypeScript tasks, queues, retries, and preview environments.

    Visit Trigger.devFull verdict →
  • Inngest4.6/10 · Free plan · paid from $99/mo

    A flexible task engine for serverless teams that need durable, observable execution.

    Visit InngestFull verdict →

More comparisons

All task queue software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026