Total Commander vs Files

Total Commander9.3Visit Files7.3Visit

Higher score Total Commander #1 in File Manager Software 9.3/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 6 of 6 features Try Total Commander

vs

Files #17 in File Manager Software 7.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 6 features Visit Files

• Total Commander fits best

  Windows users wanting a complete file manager

• Files fits best

  Windows users wanting a modern free manager

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	Total Commander 9.3/10 Visit ↗	Files 7.3/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.3	7.3
Ranking	#1 in File Manager Software	#17 in File Manager Software
Best for	Windows users wanting a complete file manager	Windows users wanting a modern free manager
Pricing model	Free plan + paid	Free plan + paid
Starting price	—	Free plan
Free plan	✓	✓
Free trial	30 days	—
Deployment	Desktop, Mobile	Desktop
Platforms	Windows, Android	Windows
Support	Email, Community, Docs	Community, Docs
Integrations	11 integrations	20 integrations
Built for	Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features Total Commander 6/6 · Files 5/6
Dual-pane view	✓	✓
Tabbed interface	✓	✓
Batch rename	✓	✓
Archive support	✓	✓
Cloud storage access	✓	✓
Portable version	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
Specs
Supported platforms	windows, android	windows
Our review
Pros	Dual-pane browsing with tabs, search, comparison, and synchronization Archives, batch renaming, FTP/FTPS, and cloud access via plugins Portable USB installation can include plugins and settings	Dual panes, tabs, layouts, previews, and a Command Palette Batch renaming plus ZIP and 7z archive management Supports many cloud-drive clients and includes Git actions
Cons	Cloud and protocol access may require plugins Windows license is a one-time purchase rather than free software The feature set may exceed the needs of users wanting simple file browsing	Windows-only availability Cloud access depends on supported desktop clients No AI features or cross-platform version
Our verdict	Total Commander is a file manager for Windows and Android aimed at users who need more control over browsing, organizing, transferring, and comparing files. Its Windows edition combines two file windows, tabs, enhanced search, batch… Read the review →	Files is an open-source desktop file manager for Windows, aimed at users who want more structure and control than a basic folder browser. Its free version combines tabbed navigation, dual-pane folder management, multiple layouts, file and… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• Total Commander — where it wins

  • Dual-pane browsing with tabs, search, comparison, and synchronization
  • Archives, batch renaming, FTP/FTPS, and cloud access via plugins
  • Portable USB installation can include plugins and settings

  Where it doesn't

  • Cloud and protocol access may require plugins
  • Windows license is a one-time purchase rather than free software
  • The feature set may exceed the needs of users wanting simple file browsing

• Files — where it wins

  • Dual panes, tabs, layouts, previews, and a Command Palette
  • Batch renaming plus ZIP and 7z archive management
  • Supports many cloud-drive clients and includes Git actions

  Where it doesn't

  • Windows-only availability
  • Cloud access depends on supported desktop clients
  • No AI features or cross-platform version

• Total Commander9.3/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial

  A feature-rich file manager for Windows users who want power beyond Explorer.

  Try Total CommanderFull verdict →
• Files7.3/10 · Free plan

  A free, flexible Windows manager with tabs, dual panes, archives, previews, and cloud access.

  Visit FilesFull verdict →