Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Data Masking Software

Tonic Structural vs IRI FieldShield

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Tonic Structural #4 in Data Masking Software 8.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 4 features Try Tonic Structural
IRI FieldShield #6 in Data Masking Software 8.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 4 features Try IRI FieldShield

Tonic Structural leads on 0 checks, IRI FieldShield on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreTonic Structural · 8.9/10
  • Most featuresTonic Structural · 2 of 4

Tonic Structural scores higher on our rubric for data masking software: 8.9 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #6.

Tonic Structural is the better fit for large teams needing governed test-data masking. IRI FieldShield is the better fit for teams needing field-level masking across systems.

  • Tonic Structural fits best

    Large teams needing governed test-data masking

  • IRI FieldShield fits best

    Teams needing field-level masking across systems

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Tonic Structural 8.9/10 Visit ↗ IRI FieldShield 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 8.7
Ranking #4 in Data Masking Software #6 in Data Masking Software
Best for Large teams needing governed test-data masking Teams needing field-level masking across systems
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price — Pricing on request
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms Web Windows, Linux
Support Email, Docs Email, Phone, Tickets, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, SSO/SAML GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS, SOC 2
Integrations 13 integrations 14 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Tonic Structural 2/4 · IRI FieldShield 0/4
Synthetic data Not checked yet Not checked yet
Referential integrity Not checked yet Not checked yet
Data subsetting ✓ (best) Not checked yet
API access ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Masking methods Not checked yet Not checked yet
Deployment options Not checked yet Hybrid
Database connectors Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Finds PII and PHI, then masks or synthesizes data consistently
  • Subsets databases while preserving referential integrity
  • Offers scheduled refreshes, APIs, audit trails, and broad connectors
  • Supports static and dynamic masking across databases and files
  • Offers encryption, hashing, redaction, pseudonymization, and tokenization
  • Provides deterministic masking, risk scoring, and audit trails
Cons
  • No free plan
  • Professional is limited to 10TB, 10 users, and 2 data source types
  • Pricing is custom, with no published numeric amounts
  • Uses contact-sales pricing with no free plan
  • Does not provide activity monitoring or threat detection
  • Its broad execution model may exceed narrowly focused masking needs
Our verdict

Tonic Structural turns production-like structured and semi-structured data into datasets for software development, QA, and regulated work. It combines sensitive-data discovery with masking and synthesis, while preserving relationships when…

Read the review →

IRI FieldShield is structured-data discovery, masking, and de-identification software for data architects, DBAs, developers, and compliance teams. It discovers and classifies sensitive information in relational databases, flat files, and…

Read the review →
  1. Tonic StructuralData Masking Software 8.9Pricing on request
  2. IRI FieldShieldData Masking Software 8.7Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Tonic Structural — where it wins

    • Finds PII and PHI, then masks or synthesizes data consistently
    • Subsets databases while preserving referential integrity
    • Offers scheduled refreshes, APIs, audit trails, and broad connectors

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan
    • Professional is limited to 10TB, 10 users, and 2 data source types
    • Pricing is custom, with no published numeric amounts
  • IRI FieldShield — where it wins

    • Supports static and dynamic masking across databases and files
    • Offers encryption, hashing, redaction, pseudonymization, and tokenization
    • Provides deterministic masking, risk scoring, and audit trails

    Where it doesn't

    • Uses contact-sales pricing with no free plan
    • Does not provide activity monitoring or threat detection
    • Its broad execution model may exceed narrowly focused masking needs

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update