Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Museum Software

TMS Collections vs eHive

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
TMS Collections #4 in Museum Software 7.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 5 of 5 features Try TMS Collections
eHive #5 in Museum Software 7.7/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit eHive

TMS Collections leads on 0 checks, eHive on 1, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Free planonly eHive

TMS Collections and eHive score identically on our rubric (7.7 out of 10) for museum software; TMS Collections sits at #4 and eHive at #5 in our editorial ranking, so the choice comes down to fit.

eHive offers free plan; TMS Collections doesn't. On deployment, TMS Collections gives you Both where eHive offers Cloud.

TMS Collections is the better fit for mid-size and large museums with complex collections. eHive is the better fit for small museums publishing collections on a free plan.

  • TMS Collections fits best

    Mid-size and large museums with complex collections

  • eHive fits best

    Small museums publishing collections on a free plan

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature TMS Collections 7.7/10 Visit ↗ eHive 7.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.7 7.7
Ranking #4 in Museum Software #5 in Museum Software
Best for Mid-size and large museums with complex collections Small museums publishing collections on a free plan
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, iOS Web
Support Email, Phone Docs
Integrations 3 integrations 3 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features TMS Collections 5/5 · eHive 5/5
Collection cataloging ✓ ✓
Loan management ✓ ✓
Exhibition management ✓ ✓
Rights tracking ✓ ✓
Public collections access ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment Both Cloud
Our review
Pros
  • Connects cataloging, exhibitions, loans, media, constituents and locations
  • Configurable fields, workflows, permissions and forms support varied processes
  • Supports cloud or institution-hosted deployment and eMuseum publishing
  • Catalogues varied object types with configurable field sets and media attachments
  • Tracks acquisitions, conservation, rights, loans, and exhibition history
  • Publishes searchable public profiles and offers REST API and OAI-PMH access
Cons
  • New licensing and implementation require a sales inquiry
  • No free plan is offered for new customers
  • Public collection browsing depends on integrated eMuseum
  • Cloud-only deployment may not suit museums needing another hosting model
  • Support is documentation-based rather than through other listed channels
  • Visitor analytics are listed only on Silver, Gold, and Platinum plans
Our verdict

Museums, archives and special collections can use TMS Collections to organize object records and the work around them. Gallery Systems describes it as a relational collections-management system that connects cataloging with media,…

Read the review →

eHive is a web-based collection cataloguing and management system for museums and collections, including archaeology, archives, art, history, libraries, natural science, and photography and multimedia. It suits small institutions that want…

Read the review →
  1. TMS CollectionsMuseum Software 7.7Pricing on request
  2. eHiveMuseum Software 7.7Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • TMS Collections — where it wins

    • Connects cataloging, exhibitions, loans, media, constituents and locations
    • Configurable fields, workflows, permissions and forms support varied processes
    • Supports cloud or institution-hosted deployment and eMuseum publishing

    Where it doesn't

    • New licensing and implementation require a sales inquiry
    • No free plan is offered for new customers
    • Public collection browsing depends on integrated eMuseum
  • eHive — where it wins

    • Catalogues varied object types with configurable field sets and media attachments
    • Tracks acquisitions, conservation, rights, loans, and exhibition history
    • Publishes searchable public profiles and offers REST API and OAI-PMH access

    Where it doesn't

    • Cloud-only deployment may not suit museums needing another hosting model
    • Support is documentation-based rather than through other listed channels
    • Visitor analytics are listed only on Silver, Gold, and Platinum plans

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update