Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Threat Modeling Software

ThreatModeler Nexus vs ThreatZ

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score ThreatModeler Nexus #4 in Threat Modeling Software 7.7/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit ThreatModeler
ThreatZ #8 in Threat Modeling Software 6.9/10 From $1,199/mo (annual) ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit ThreatZ

ThreatModeler Nexus leads on 1 check, ThreatZ on 1, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreThreatModeler Nexus · 7.7/10
  • Free planonly ThreatModeler Nexus
  • Most featuresThreatZ · 4 of 4

ThreatModeler Nexus scores higher on our rubric for threat modeling software: 7.7 against 6.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #8.

ThreatModeler Nexus offers free plan; ThreatZ doesn't. ThreatZ offers collaborative review; ThreatModeler Nexus doesn't publish it.

ThreatModeler Nexus is the better fit for cloud-native teams needing AI-assisted modeling. ThreatZ is the better fit for automotive enterprises needing full assurance workflows.

  • ThreatModeler Nexus fits best

    Cloud-native teams needing AI-assisted modeling

  • ThreatZ fits best

    Automotive enterprises needing full assurance workflows

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature ThreatModeler Nexus 7.7/10 Visit ↗ ThreatZ 6.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.7 6.9
Ranking #4 in Threat Modeling Software #8 in Threat Modeling Software
Best for Cloud-native teams needing AI-assisted modeling Automotive enterprises needing full assurance workflows
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Tickets Email
Compliance SOC 2, ISO 27001, SSO/SAML GDPR, SSO/SAML, 2FA
Integrations 14 integrations 30+ integrations
Built for Enterprise, Mid-market Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features ThreatModeler Nexus 3/4 · ThreatZ 4/4
Attack-path analysis ✓ ✓
Risk prioritization ✓ ✓
Collaborative review Not published ✓ (best)
Templates and frameworks ✓ ✓
Specs
Project limit Not published 3 projects
Modeling methods Multiple Multiple
Deployment Both Both
Our review
Pros
  • Maps systems from diagrams, code, documents, cloud, and infrastructure-as-code
  • Prioritizes risk and records attack paths with threats and countermeasures
  • Connects modeling with CI/CD, compliance reporting, SSO, and audit trails
  • Combines TARA, attack paths, risk assessment, SBOM and compliance work products
  • Connects with Jira, GitHub, DOORS, Polarion, CodeQL and vulnerability databases
  • Supports hosted private cloud, on-premise and air-gapped deployments
Cons
  • No open-source edition
  • The listed platform is web-based rather than a native desktop client
  • Enterprise governance features may add overhead to lightweight reviews
  • Team is limited to three projects
  • No free plan is available
  • Professional pricing is charged per user per month
Our verdict

ThreatModeler Nexus is an enterprise threat-modeling platform for security, architecture, development, and compliance teams. It builds system maps from architecture diagrams, code, documents, cloud environments, and infrastructure-as-code,…

Read the review →

ThreatZ is an automotive cybersecurity engineering platform for OEMs and Tier-1 suppliers. It brings system and vehicle architecture modeling, TARA, attack-path analysis, risk assessment, SBOM management, vulnerability monitoring, security…

Read the review →
  1. ThreatModeler NexusThreat Modeling Software 7.7Free plan
  2. ThreatZThreat Modeling Software 6.9From $1,199/mo (annual)

Strengths and trade-offs

  • ThreatModeler Nexus — where it wins

    • Maps systems from diagrams, code, documents, cloud, and infrastructure-as-code
    • Prioritizes risk and records attack paths with threats and countermeasures
    • Connects modeling with CI/CD, compliance reporting, SSO, and audit trails

    Where it doesn't

    • No open-source edition
    • The listed platform is web-based rather than a native desktop client
    • Enterprise governance features may add overhead to lightweight reviews
  • ThreatZ — where it wins

    • Combines TARA, attack paths, risk assessment, SBOM and compliance work products
    • Connects with Jira, GitHub, DOORS, Polarion, CodeQL and vulnerability databases
    • Supports hosted private cloud, on-premise and air-gapped deployments

    Where it doesn't

    • Team is limited to three projects
    • No free plan is available
    • Professional pricing is charged per user per month
  • ThreatModeler Nexus7.7/10 · Free plan

    AI-assisted threat modeling with attack paths, risk prioritization, compliance, and CI/CD checks.

    Visit ThreatModelerFull verdict →
  • ThreatZ6.9/10 · From $1,199/mo (annual)

    A broad automotive threat modeling suite for enterprises managing assurance across complex programs.

    Visit ThreatZFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update