Head-to-head · Tanning Salon Software
Tan-Link vs Glo
Tan-Link leads on 0 checks, Glo on 0, and 7 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 7 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreTan-Link · 7.6/10
- Most featuresTan-Link · 6 of 6
Tan-Link scores higher on our rubric for tanning salon software: 7.6 against 7.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #7 and #8.
Tan-Link is the better fit for small to mid-size multi-location tanning salons. Glo is the better fit for salons wanting broad operations and reporting.
- Tan-Link fits best
Small to mid-size multi-location tanning salons
- Glo fits best
Salons wanting broad operations and reporting
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Tan-Link 7.6/10 Visit ↗ | Glo 7.5/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 7.6 | 7.5 |
| Ranking | #7 in Tanning Salon Software | #8 in Tanning Salon Software |
| Best for | Small to mid-size multi-location tanning salons | Salons wanting broad operations and reporting |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | $129/mo | From £40/mo · 7-day trial |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Email, Phone, Docs | Email, Live chat, Tickets, Docs |
| Integrations | 5 integrations | 2 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Tan-Link 6/6 · Glo 5/6 | ||
| UV bed scheduling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Spray-tan scheduling | ✓ | ✓ |
| Membership management | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Packages | ✓ | ✓ |
| Point of sale | ✓ | ✓ |
| Compliance records | ✓ | ✓ |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Tan-Link is cloud-based management software for tanning salons, aimed at small and mid-market operators, including businesses managing multiple locations. It combines point-of-sale transactions, integrated payments, recurring membership… Read the review → |
Glo is a cloud-based tanning salon management system for salons that need to coordinate appointments, client records and day-to-day operations. Its calendar schedules across tanning beds with colour-coded appointment statuses, while… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Tan-Link — where it wins
- T-Max bed control, session tracking and lamp-hour monitoring
- Memberships, packages, waivers, POS and recurring billing in one system
- Online booking, customer portal and multi-location management
Where it doesn't
- No free plan; pricing starts at $129 per location monthly
- Web deployment limits access to browser-based use
- Support is offered by email, phone and docs, not 24/7
Glo — where it wins
- Schedules UV beds and spray-tan services, with bed-use and maintenance tracking
- Combines client skin assessments, course balances and digital consent records
- Adds POS, inventory and detailed reports, with Stripe and SumUp payments
Where it doesn't
- Online booking widget costs an extra £20 per month on Starter and Professional
- Inventory and advanced analytics require the £50-per-month Professional plan
- Prepaid minute courses are documented, but membership management is not established
- Tan-Link7.6/10 · From $129/mo
Cloud tanning salon software combining T-Max control, memberships, POS and multi-location tools.
Visit Tan-LinkFull verdict → - Glo7.5/10 · From £40/mo · 7-day trial
Glo brings bed scheduling, sales, client records and reporting into one salon system.
Visit GloFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Insight Salon Software vs Tan-Link
- Insight Salon Software vs Glo
- GymMaster vs Tan-Link
- GymMaster vs Glo
- EasyWeek for Veterinary Clinics vs Tan-Link
- EasyWeek for Veterinary Clinics vs Glo
- SalonTouch vs Tan-Link
- SalonTouch vs Glo
All tanning salon software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update


