Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Tanning Salon Software

EasyWeek for Veterinary Clinics vs Tan-Link

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 8 checks side by side
Higher score EasyWeek for Veterinary Clinics #3 in Tanning Salon Software 8.0/10 Free plan · paid from $8.33/mo · 14-day trial Free plan✓ 0 of 6 features Visit EasyWeek
Tan-Link #7 in Tanning Salon Software 7.6/10 From $129/mo ✓ 6 of 6 features Visit Tan-Link

EasyWeek for Veterinary Clinics leads on 2 checks, Tan-Link on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 8 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreEasyWeek for Veterinary Clinics · 8.0/10
  • Lowest starting priceEasyWeek for Veterinary Clinics · $8.33/mo
  • Free planonly EasyWeek for Veterinary Clinics
  • Most featuresTan-Link · 6 of 6

EasyWeek for Veterinary Clinics scores higher on our rubric for tanning salon software: 8.0 against 7.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #7.

EasyWeek for Veterinary Clinics offers free plan; Tan-Link doesn't. EasyWeek for Veterinary Clinics is cheaper to start at $8.33/mo against $129/mo.

EasyWeek for Veterinary Clinics is the better fit for businesses prioritizing low-cost omnichannel booking. Tan-Link is the better fit for small to mid-size multi-location tanning salons.

  • EasyWeek for Veterinary Clinics fits best

    Businesses prioritizing low-cost omnichannel booking

  • Tan-Link fits best

    Small to mid-size multi-location tanning salons

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature EasyWeek for Veterinary Clinics 8.0/10 Visit ↗ Tan-Link 7.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.0 7.6
Ranking #3 in Tanning Salon Software #7 in Tanning Salon Software
Best for Businesses prioritizing low-cost omnichannel booking Small to mid-size multi-location tanning salons
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price $8.33/mo (best) $129/mo
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Mobile, Browser extension Cloud
Platforms Web, iOS, Android, Chrome extension Web
Support Email, Live chat, Docs · 24/7 Email, Phone, Docs
Integrations 3,000+ integrations 5 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market
Features EasyWeek for Veterinary Clinics 0/6 · Tan-Link 6/6
UV bed scheduling Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Spray-tan scheduling Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Membership management Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Packages Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Point of sale Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Compliance records Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Our review
Pros
  • Free plan and Pro at $8.33 per month, billed monthly
  • Booking, reminders, and calendar sync across web and mobile apps
  • Integrates with calendars, payment tools, messaging, and automation services
  • T-Max bed control, session tracking and lamp-hour monitoring
  • Memberships, packages, waivers, POS and recurring billing in one system
  • Online booking, customer portal and multi-location management
Cons
  • Veterinary-specific features do not establish tanning salon workflows
  • Pet medical records and online consultations may not fit tanning businesses
  • The Free plan is described only as including essential features
  • No free plan; pricing starts at $129 per location monthly
  • Web deployment limits access to browser-based use
  • Support is offered by email, phone and docs, not 24/7
Our verdict

EasyWeek for Veterinary Clinics is a cloud-based booking and practice-management product designed for veterinary clinics. It brings together online appointment booking, staff scheduling, pet medical records, reminders, customer management,…

Read the review →

Tan-Link is cloud-based management software for tanning salons, aimed at small and mid-market operators, including businesses managing multiple locations. It combines point-of-sale transactions, integrated payments, recurring membership…

Read the review →
  1. EasyWeek for Veterinary ClinicsTanning Salon Software 8.0Free plan · paid from $8.33/mo · 14-day trial
  2. Tan-LinkTanning Salon Software 7.6From $129/mo

Strengths and trade-offs

  • EasyWeek for Veterinary Clinics — where it wins

    • Free plan and Pro at $8.33 per month, billed monthly
    • Booking, reminders, and calendar sync across web and mobile apps
    • Integrates with calendars, payment tools, messaging, and automation services

    Where it doesn't

    • Veterinary-specific features do not establish tanning salon workflows
    • Pet medical records and online consultations may not fit tanning businesses
    • The Free plan is described only as including essential features
  • Tan-Link — where it wins

    • T-Max bed control, session tracking and lamp-hour monitoring
    • Memberships, packages, waivers, POS and recurring billing in one system
    • Online booking, customer portal and multi-location management

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; pricing starts at $129 per location monthly
    • Web deployment limits access to browser-based use
    • Support is offered by email, phone and docs, not 24/7
  • EasyWeek for Veterinary Clinics8.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $8.33/mo · 14-day trial

    Low-cost booking across web and mobile, built around veterinary clinic workflows.

    Visit EasyWeekFull verdict →
  • Tan-Link7.6/10 · From $129/mo

    Cloud tanning salon software combining T-Max control, memberships, POS and multi-location tools.

    Visit Tan-LinkFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update