Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · SBOM Generation Tools

Syft vs BomLens

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 7 checks side by side
Higher score Syft #5 in SBOM Generation Tools 7.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 6 features Visit Syft
BomLens #8 in SBOM Generation Tools 7.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 6 of 6 features Explore BomLens

Syft leads on 0 checks, BomLens on 0, and 7 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 7 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreSyft · 7.9/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresBomLens · 6 of 6

Syft scores higher on our rubric for sbom generation tools: 7.9 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #8.

Syft is the better fit for broad SBOM generation across images and filesystems. BomLens is the better fit for teams needing SBOMs across varied software inputs.

  • Syft fits best

    Broad SBOM generation across images and filesystems

  • BomLens fits best

    Teams needing SBOMs across varied software inputs

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Syft 7.9/10 Visit ↗ BomLens 7.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.9 7.8
Ranking #5 in SBOM Generation Tools #8 in SBOM Generation Tools
Best for Broad SBOM generation across images and filesystems Teams needing SBOMs across varied software inputs
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms Linux, macOS, Windows Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Community, Docs Community, Docs
Integrations 4 integrations 2 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Syft 5/6 · BomLens 6/6
SPDX output ✓ ✓
CycloneDX output ✓ ✓
Source code input ✓ ✓
Container image input ✓ ✓
Binary input ✓ ✓
Build-pipeline support Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Our review
Pros
  • Creates CycloneDX and SPDX output and converts between supported formats
  • Scans images from Docker, Podman, Containerd, OCI archives, and registries
  • Generates signed SBOM attestations using the in-toto specification
  • Scans source, containers, binaries, firmware, and existing SBOMs
  • Generates CycloneDX 1.6 and can emit SPDX 2.3 copies
  • Offers browser, CLI, and desktop interfaces for local workflows
Cons
  • Command-line and Go library workflows may not suit teams seeking a graphical interface
  • Self-hosted deployment places operation with the adopting team
  • Support is through community channels and documentation
  • Runs locally with Docker rather than as hosted SaaS
  • Desktop installers are available for Windows and macOS only
  • Listed support channels are community and documentation
Our verdict

Syft is an open-source command-line tool and Go library from Anchore for generating software bills of materials. It suits teams that need to inventory software across container images, filesystems, directories, individual files, and…

Read the review →

BomLens is an open-source supply-chain security tool from SK Telecom for creating software bills of materials and assessing supply-chain risk. It suits teams that need to scan different kinds of inputs, including source folders, GitHub…

Read the review →
  1. SyftSBOM Generation Tools 7.9Free plan
  2. BomLensSBOM Generation Tools 7.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Syft — where it wins

    • Creates CycloneDX and SPDX output and converts between supported formats
    • Scans images from Docker, Podman, Containerd, OCI archives, and registries
    • Generates signed SBOM attestations using the in-toto specification

    Where it doesn't

    • Command-line and Go library workflows may not suit teams seeking a graphical interface
    • Self-hosted deployment places operation with the adopting team
    • Support is through community channels and documentation
  • BomLens — where it wins

    • Scans source, containers, binaries, firmware, and existing SBOMs
    • Generates CycloneDX 1.6 and can emit SPDX 2.3 copies
    • Offers browser, CLI, and desktop interfaces for local workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Runs locally with Docker rather than as hosted SaaS
    • Desktop installers are available for Windows and macOS only
    • Listed support channels are community and documentation

Syft vs BomLens: questions

Which is better for SBOM generation tools, Syft or BomLens?

Syft scores higher on our rubric for sbom generation tools: 7.9 against 7.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #8.

How do Syft and BomLens compare?

All 7 checks we put side by side come out level: neither leads on any.

Do Syft and BomLens have a free plan?

Syft: Yes. BomLens: Yes.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update