Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Linters

Stylelint vs Oxlint

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Stylelint #4 in Linters 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 4 features Visit Stylelint
Oxlint #33 in Linters 5.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Oxlint

Stylelint leads on 1 check, Oxlint on 1, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreStylelint · 8.8/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresOxlint · 4 of 4

Stylelint scores higher on our rubric for linters: 8.8 against 5.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #33.

Stylelint leads on languages supported: 8 versus 2. Oxlint offers security rules; Stylelint doesn't.

Stylelint is the better fit for CSS and CSS-like language teams. Oxlint is the better fit for javaScript teams covering modern web formats.

  • Stylelint fits best

    CSS and CSS-like language teams

  • Oxlint fits best

    JavaScript teams covering modern web formats

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Stylelint 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Oxlint 5.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 5.9
Ranking #4 in Linters #33 in Linters
Best for CSS and CSS-like language teams JavaScript teams covering modern web formats
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Support Docs, Community Community, Docs
Integrations 9 integrations 10 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Stylelint 3/4 · Oxlint 4/4
Autofix ✓ ✓
Custom rules ✓ ✓
Security rules — ✓ (best)
CI support ✓ ✓
Specs
Languages supported 8 (best) 2
IDE support Ide Ide
Our review
Pros
  • More than 100 built-in rules with autofix for supported problems
  • Plugins, shareable configs, and custom syntax support
  • Node.js, PostCSS, editor, and CI integration options
  • Supports JavaScript, TypeScript, JSX, TSX, Vue, Svelte, and Astro
  • Combines type-aware linting, autofix, suggestions, and custom plugins
  • Connects with major editors plus GitHub Actions and GitLab CI
Cons
  • Specialized around CSS and CSS-like languages
  • Platform coverage centers on API and self-hosted workflows
  • Autofix applies only to supported problems
  • Focused on JavaScript and TypeScript rather than multi-language linting
  • CI workflow integrations center on GitHub Actions and GitLab CI
  • Custom extension support uses JavaScript plugins
Our verdict

Stylelint is an open-source linter for CSS and CSS-like syntaxes. It checks for invalid or problematic constructs, unknown properties, naming violations, convention issues, and other rule-defined problems. Its audience is teams working…

Read the review →

Oxlint is a Rust-based, open-source linter for JavaScript and TypeScript projects. It is aimed at application and library developers, toolchain teams, and organizations maintaining large repositories. Its format coverage includes…

Read the review →
  1. StylelintLinters 8.8Free plan
  2. OxlintLinters 5.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Stylelint — where it wins

    • More than 100 built-in rules with autofix for supported problems
    • Plugins, shareable configs, and custom syntax support
    • Node.js, PostCSS, editor, and CI integration options

    Where it doesn't

    • Specialized around CSS and CSS-like languages
    • Platform coverage centers on API and self-hosted workflows
    • Autofix applies only to supported problems
  • Oxlint — where it wins

    • Supports JavaScript, TypeScript, JSX, TSX, Vue, Svelte, and Astro
    • Combines type-aware linting, autofix, suggestions, and custom plugins
    • Connects with major editors plus GitHub Actions and GitLab CI

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on JavaScript and TypeScript rather than multi-language linting
    • CI workflow integrations center on GitHub Actions and GitLab CI
    • Custom extension support uses JavaScript plugins

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update