Head-to-head · Linters
Stylelint vs golangci-lint
Stylelint leads on 1 check, golangci-lint on 1, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreStylelint · 8.8/10
- Free planboth
- Most featuresgolangci-lint · 4 of 4
Stylelint scores higher on our rubric for linters: 8.8 against 7.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #15.
Stylelint leads on languages supported: 8 versus 1. golangci-lint offers security rules; Stylelint doesn't.
Stylelint is the better fit for CSS and CSS-like language teams. golangci-lint is the better fit for go teams wanting many linters in one tool.
- Stylelint fits best
CSS and CSS-like language teams
- golangci-lint fits best
Go teams wanting many linters in one tool
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Stylelint 8.8/10 Visit ↗ | golangci-lint 7.7/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.8 | 7.7 |
| Ranking | #4 in Linters | #15 in Linters |
| Best for | CSS and CSS-like language teams | Go teams wanting many linters in one tool |
| Pricing model | Free | Free |
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted, Browser extension | Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Linux, macOS, Windows | Windows, macOS, Linux |
| Support | Docs, Community | Docs |
| Integrations | 9 integrations | 9 integrations |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Stylelint 3/4 · golangci-lint 4/4 | ||
| Autofix | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom rules | ✓ | ✓ |
| Security rules | — | ✓ (best) |
| CI support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Languages supported | 8 (best) | 1 |
| IDE support | Ide | Ide |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Stylelint is an open-source linter for CSS and CSS-like syntaxes. It checks for invalid or problematic constructs, unknown properties, naming violations, convention issues, and other rule-defined problems. Its audience is teams working… Read the review → |
golangci-lint is an open-source command-line tool for analyzing Go code with multiple linters. It is suited to Go teams that want one configurable runner for correctness, style, performance, unused-code, and security-related checks. The… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Stylelint — where it wins
- More than 100 built-in rules with autofix for supported problems
- Plugins, shareable configs, and custom syntax support
- Node.js, PostCSS, editor, and CI integration options
Where it doesn't
- Specialized around CSS and CSS-like languages
- Platform coverage centers on API and self-hosted workflows
- Autofix applies only to supported problems
golangci-lint — where it wins
- Runs multiple Go linters in parallel with caching
- Supports autofixes, custom linters, and YAML configuration
- Works with major IDEs and CI systems
Where it doesn't
- Focused on Go rather than multiple programming languages
- Command-line workflow may not suit teams seeking a broader platform
- AI features are not included
- Stylelint8.8/10 · Free plan
A capable, extensible CSS linter for teams that want configurable rules and CI support.
Visit StylelintFull verdict → - golangci-lint7.7/10 · Free plan
A focused open-source tool for running and managing many Go linters.
Visit golangci-lintFull verdict →
More comparisons
- ESLint vs Stylelint
- Ruff vs Stylelint
- ShellCheck vs Stylelint
- Stylelint vs clang-tidy
- Stylelint vs Clippy
- Stylelint vs Credo
- Stylelint vs Biome
All linters comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update







