Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Chaos Engineering Platforms

Steadybit vs Tumult

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Steadybit #5 in Chaos Engineering Platforms 8.8/10 Pricing on request · 30-day trial Free trial✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Steadybit
Tumult #12 in Chaos Engineering Platforms 8.1/10 Open source ✓ 4 of 5 features Visit Tumult

Steadybit leads on 1 check, Tumult on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreSteadybit · 8.8/10
  • Free trialonly Steadybit
  • Most featuresSteadybit · 5 of 5

Steadybit scores higher on our rubric for chaos engineering platforms: 8.8 against 8.1 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #12.

Steadybit offers experiment scheduling; Tumult doesn't. On deployment model, Steadybit gives you Hybrid where Tumult offers Self_hosted.

Steadybit is the better fit for enterprise reliability workflows and governance. Tumult is the better fit for governed, observable self-hosted experiments.

  • Steadybit fits best

    Enterprise reliability workflows and governance

  • Tumult fits best

    Governed, observable self-hosted experiments

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Steadybit 8.8/10 Visit ↗ Tumult 8.1/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.1
Ranking #5 in Chaos Engineering Platforms #12 in Chaos Engineering Platforms
Best for Enterprise reliability workflows and governance Governed, observable self-hosted experiments
Pricing model Paid Free
Starting price — Open source
Free plan — Not checked yet
Free trial 30 days —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web, macOS, Linux
Support Email, Tickets, Docs Docs
Compliance GDPR, SSO/SAML SOC 2, ISO 27001, PCI DSS
Integrations 28+ integrations 3 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Steadybit 5/5 · Tumult 4/5
Kubernetes support ✓ ✓
Cloud fault injection ✓ ✓
Network fault injection ✓ ✓
Experiment scheduling ✓ (best) —
Blast-radius controls ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Self_hosted
Our review
Pros
  • No-code experiments with blast-radius controls and emergency stops
  • Broad fault injection across Kubernetes, cloud, networks, hosts, and applications
  • CI/CD, API, CLI, scheduled execution, reports, and audit logs
  • Risk-tiered approvals with quorum, TTL, and content-hash pinning
  • Kubernetes, multi-cloud, network, and system-fault experiment coverage
  • OpenTelemetry traces, DuckDB analytics, and compliance reports
Cons
  • Professional and Enterprise plans require contact with Steadybit
  • There is no permanent free plan
  • Advanced governance features are reserved for Enterprise
  • Self-hosted deployment requires a static binary or Docker image
  • Native experiment scheduling is not currently available
  • Integrations are centered on OpenTelemetry, Jaeger, and SigNoz
Our verdict

Steadybit is a chaos engineering and reliability testing platform for software, platform, and reliability teams. It helps organizations discover system components, identify reliability risks, design no-code experiments, inject faults, and…

Read the review →

Tumult is an open-source chaos engineering platform for reliability, platform, and SRE teams. It provides web UI and CLI experiment authoring, with support for Kubernetes pods, deployments, nodes, and network policies; AWS, Azure, and GCP…

Read the review →
  1. SteadybitChaos Engineering Platforms 8.8Pricing on request · 30-day trial
  2. TumultChaos Engineering Platforms 8.1Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Steadybit — where it wins

    • No-code experiments with blast-radius controls and emergency stops
    • Broad fault injection across Kubernetes, cloud, networks, hosts, and applications
    • CI/CD, API, CLI, scheduled execution, reports, and audit logs

    Where it doesn't

    • Professional and Enterprise plans require contact with Steadybit
    • There is no permanent free plan
    • Advanced governance features are reserved for Enterprise
  • Tumult — where it wins

    • Risk-tiered approvals with quorum, TTL, and content-hash pinning
    • Kubernetes, multi-cloud, network, and system-fault experiment coverage
    • OpenTelemetry traces, DuckDB analytics, and compliance reports

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires a static binary or Docker image
    • Native experiment scheduling is not currently available
    • Integrations are centered on OpenTelemetry, Jaeger, and SigNoz
  • Steadybit8.8/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial

    A governed, no-code platform for running controlled reliability experiments at scale.

    Visit SteadybitFull verdict →
  • Tumult8.1/10 · Open source

    A self-hosted platform for controlled, observable Kubernetes and multi-cloud experiments.

    Visit TumultFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update