Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Headless CMS

Squidex vs Payload CMS

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Squidex #4 in Headless CMS 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Squidex
Payload CMS #6 in Headless CMS 8.8/10 Open source ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Payload CMS

Squidex leads on 0 checks, Payload CMS on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreSquidex · 9.0/10
  • Free planonly Squidex

Squidex scores higher on our rubric for headless cms: 9.0 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #6.

Squidex is the better fit for developers wanting open-source deployment options. Payload CMS is the better fit for developers building self-hosted TypeScript systems.

  • Squidex fits best

    Developers wanting open-source deployment options

  • Payload CMS fits best

    Developers building self-hosted TypeScript systems

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Squidex 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Payload CMS 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.8
Ranking #4 in Headless CMS #6 in Headless CMS
Best for Developers wanting open-source deployment options Developers building self-hosted TypeScript systems
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price — Open source
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Docs Community, Docs
Compliance GDPR GDPR, SSO/SAML
Integrations 15 integrations 5 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Squidex 4/4 · Payload CMS 4/4
Content localization ✓ ✓
Webhooks ✓ ✓
Content preview ✓ ✓
Asset transformations ✓ ✓
Specs
API types Both Both
Role permissions Custom Custom
Our review
Pros
  • Self-hosting with Docker or Kubernetes deployment options
  • REST and GraphQL APIs with structured schemas and localized content
  • Fine-grained permissions, previews, version history, and image processing
  • REST and GraphQL APIs support flexible content delivery
  • Field- and document-level access control supports custom permissions
  • Next.js integration, drafts, previews, and localization support modern builds
Cons
  • Self-hosted deployments require Docker or Kubernetes operations
  • Usage limits vary across API, traffic, storage, and contributor tiers
  • The platform may exceed the needs of teams seeking a simpler CMS
  • Self-hosting requires teams to manage deployment and infrastructure
  • Payload Cloud deployment of new projects is currently paused
  • The code-first approach may not suit teams seeking a no-code CMS
Our verdict

Squidex is an open-source headless CMS for teams managing structured content, assets, schemas, workflows, and localized entries. Developers can deliver content to websites, mobile applications, and other digital products through REST and…

Read the review →

Payload CMS is an open-source, code-first headless CMS and TypeScript application framework for developers, marketers, agencies, and enterprise teams. It supports configurable collections and global documents, authentication, custom access…

Read the review →
  1. SquidexHeadless CMS 9.0Free plan
  2. Payload CMSHeadless CMS 8.8Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Squidex — where it wins

    • Self-hosting with Docker or Kubernetes deployment options
    • REST and GraphQL APIs with structured schemas and localized content
    • Fine-grained permissions, previews, version history, and image processing

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployments require Docker or Kubernetes operations
    • Usage limits vary across API, traffic, storage, and contributor tiers
    • The platform may exceed the needs of teams seeking a simpler CMS
  • Payload CMS — where it wins

    • REST and GraphQL APIs support flexible content delivery
    • Field- and document-level access control supports custom permissions
    • Next.js integration, drafts, previews, and localization support modern builds

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosting requires teams to manage deployment and infrastructure
    • Payload Cloud deployment of new projects is currently paused
    • The code-first approach may not suit teams seeking a no-code CMS

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update