Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Headless CMS

Squidex vs CrafterCMS

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Squidex #4 in Headless CMS 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Squidex
CrafterCMS #5 in Headless CMS 8.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit CrafterCMS

Squidex leads on 0 checks, CrafterCMS on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreSquidex · 9.0/10
  • Free planboth

Squidex scores higher on our rubric for headless cms: 9.0 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #5.

Squidex is the better fit for developers wanting open-source deployment options. CrafterCMS is the better fit for enterprise teams wanting open-source DevContentOps.

  • Squidex fits best

    Developers wanting open-source deployment options

  • CrafterCMS fits best

    Enterprise teams wanting open-source DevContentOps

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Squidex 9.0/10 Visit ↗ CrafterCMS 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.9
Ranking #4 in Headless CMS #5 in Headless CMS
Best for Developers wanting open-source deployment options Enterprise teams wanting open-source DevContentOps
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price — Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Docs Email, Community, Docs · 24/7
Compliance GDPR SOC 2, SSO/SAML
Integrations 15 integrations 5 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Squidex 4/4 · CrafterCMS 4/4
Content localization ✓ ✓
Webhooks ✓ ✓
Content preview ✓ ✓
Asset transformations ✓ ✓
Specs
API types Both Both
Role permissions Custom Custom
Our review
Pros
  • Self-hosting with Docker or Kubernetes deployment options
  • REST and GraphQL APIs with structured schemas and localized content
  • Fine-grained permissions, previews, version history, and image processing
  • Free Community edition with Git-based DevContentOps workflows
  • REST and GraphQL APIs support multiple digital channels
  • Multisite, multilingual management with approvals and granular permissions
Cons
  • Self-hosted deployments require Docker or Kubernetes operations
  • Usage limits vary across API, traffic, storage, and contributor tiers
  • The platform may exceed the needs of teams seeking a simpler CMS
  • Paid Enterprise and Cloud editions add commercial commitments
  • Self-hosting requires responsibility for deployment and operations
  • Its broad scope may exceed the needs of a single-site team
Our verdict

Squidex is an open-source headless CMS for teams managing structured content, assets, schemas, workflows, and localized entries. Developers can deliver content to websites, mobile applications, and other digital products through REST and…

Read the review →

CrafterCMS is an open-source, Git-based headless and hybrid-headless CMS for enterprise websites, portals, intranets, mobile applications, and other content-driven experiences. It suits teams that want open-source DevContentOps workflows…

Read the review →
  1. SquidexHeadless CMS 9.0Free plan
  2. CrafterCMSHeadless CMS 8.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Squidex — where it wins

    • Self-hosting with Docker or Kubernetes deployment options
    • REST and GraphQL APIs with structured schemas and localized content
    • Fine-grained permissions, previews, version history, and image processing

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployments require Docker or Kubernetes operations
    • Usage limits vary across API, traffic, storage, and contributor tiers
    • The platform may exceed the needs of teams seeking a simpler CMS
  • CrafterCMS — where it wins

    • Free Community edition with Git-based DevContentOps workflows
    • REST and GraphQL APIs support multiple digital channels
    • Multisite, multilingual management with approvals and granular permissions

    Where it doesn't

    • Paid Enterprise and Cloud editions add commercial commitments
    • Self-hosting requires responsibility for deployment and operations
    • Its broad scope may exceed the needs of a single-site team

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update