Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Virtual Recording Studio Software

SquadCast vs Iris.fm

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
SquadCast #5 in Virtual Recording Studio Software 6.7/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 3 features Visit SquadCast
Higher score Iris.fm #8 in Virtual Recording Studio Software 9.0/10 Free plan · paid from $9/mo Free plan✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Iris.fm

SquadCast leads on 0 checks, Iris.fm on 1, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreIris.fm · 9.0/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresIris.fm · 3 of 3

Iris.fm scores higher on our rubric for virtual recording studio software: 9.0 against 6.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #8 and #5.

Iris.fm offers video recording; SquadCast doesn't publish it.

SquadCast is the better fit for teams recording remote interviews with isolated tracks. Iris.fm is the better fit for budget-conscious mobile-friendly interview creators.

  • SquadCast fits best

    Teams recording remote interviews with isolated tracks

  • Iris.fm fits best

    Budget-conscious mobile-friendly interview creators

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature SquadCast 6.7/10 Visit ↗ Iris.fm 9.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 6.7 9.0
Ranking #5 in Virtual Recording Studio Software #8 in Virtual Recording Studio Software
Best for Teams recording remote interviews with isolated tracks Budget-conscious mobile-friendly interview creators
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Not published $9/mo
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web, iOS, Android
Support Email, Docs · 24/7 Email
Integrations 10 integrations 2 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features SquadCast 2/3 · Iris.fm 3/3
Separate tracks ✓ ✓
Video recording Not published ✓ (best)
Transcription ✓ ✓
Specs
Max participants Not published 9 participants
Max video resolution Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Local ISO tracks with progressive uploads and cloud backups
  • 4K watermark-free exports, video, and screen recording on Creator and Business
  • Integrations span Descript, calendars, Dropbox, Zapier, and Captivate
  • Records separate local audio and video tracks for each participant
  • Supports live captions, automatic transcriptions, and progressive uploads
  • Offers web, iOS, and Android access with Drive and Dropbox uploads
Cons
  • Web-only deployment limits native desktop recording options
  • Plans cap recording hours per editor each month
  • Standalone service is transitioning toward deeper Descript integration
  • Cloud deployment means recordings are not self-hosted
  • Google Drive and Dropbox are the listed storage integrations
  • Email is the listed support channel
Our verdict

SquadCast is a browser-based remote recording studio for podcasters, video creators, producers, and guests. It records each participant locally in separate tracks while progressively uploading files for cloud backup. Sessions support…

Read the review →

For podcasters, interviewers, co-hosts, and video creators recording remotely, Iris.fm provides browser-based recording with separate local audio and video files for each participant. Guests join through a link without installing an app,…

Read the review →
  1. SquadCastVirtual Recording Studio Software 6.7Free plan
  2. Iris.fmVirtual Recording Studio Software 9.0Free plan · paid from $9/mo

Strengths and trade-offs

  • SquadCast — where it wins

    • Local ISO tracks with progressive uploads and cloud backups
    • 4K watermark-free exports, video, and screen recording on Creator and Business
    • Integrations span Descript, calendars, Dropbox, Zapier, and Captivate

    Where it doesn't

    • Web-only deployment limits native desktop recording options
    • Plans cap recording hours per editor each month
    • Standalone service is transitioning toward deeper Descript integration
  • Iris.fm — where it wins

    • Records separate local audio and video tracks for each participant
    • Supports live captions, automatic transcriptions, and progressive uploads
    • Offers web, iOS, and Android access with Drive and Dropbox uploads

    Where it doesn't

    • Cloud deployment means recordings are not self-hosted
    • Google Drive and Dropbox are the listed storage integrations
    • Email is the listed support channel
  • SquadCast6.7/10 · Free plan

    A browser studio for isolated-track interviews, screen capture, and collaborative workflows.

    Visit SquadCastFull verdict →
  • Iris.fm9.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $9/mo

    A budget-friendly remote recording studio with separate tracks, captions, and transcription.

    Visit Iris.fmFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026