Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Virtual Recording Studio Software

Riverside vs Iris.fm

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Riverside #2 in Virtual Recording Studio Software 8.9/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Riverside
Iris.fm #8 in Virtual Recording Studio Software 7.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 3 features Visit Iris.fm

Riverside leads on 0 checks, Iris.fm on 1, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreRiverside · 8.9/10
  • Lowest starting priceIris.fm · $9/mo
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialonly Riverside

Riverside scores higher on our rubric for virtual recording studio software: 8.9 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #8.

Iris.fm is cheaper to start at $9/mo against $15/mo.

Riverside is the better fit for creators producing polished remote audio and video. Iris.fm is the better fit for budget-conscious mobile-friendly interview creators.

  • Riverside fits best

    Creators producing polished remote audio and video

  • Iris.fm fits best

    Budget-conscious mobile-friendly interview creators

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Riverside 8.9/10 Visit ↗ Iris.fm 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 7.9
Ranking #2 in Virtual Recording Studio Software #8 in Virtual Recording Studio Software
Best for Creators producing polished remote audio and video Budget-conscious mobile-friendly interview creators
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $15/mo $9/mo (best)
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 14 days —
Deployment Cloud, Desktop, Mobile Cloud
Platforms Web, macOS, iOS, Android Web, iOS, Android
Support Live chat, Docs · 24/7 Email
Integrations 8 integrations 2 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market
Features Riverside 3/3 · Iris.fm 3/3
Separate tracks ✓ ✓
Video recording ✓ ✓
Transcription ✓ ✓
Specs
Max participants Not checked yet 9 participants
Max video resolution Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Records separate audio and video tracks locally on each participant’s device
  • Combines text-based editing, transcription, AI clips, and show notes
  • Supports 4K video, streaming, podcast hosting, and publishing integrations
  • Records separate local audio and video tracks for each participant
  • Supports live captions, automatic transcriptions, and progressive uploads
  • Offers web, iOS, and Android access with Drive and Dropbox uploads
Cons
  • Free exports include a watermark and video is limited to 720p
  • Free multi-track recording is capped at 2 hours
  • Separate-track downloads and streaming features require paid plans
  • Cloud deployment means recordings are not self-hosted
  • Google Drive and Dropbox are the listed storage integrations
  • Email is the listed support channel
Our verdict

Riverside brings remote audio and video recording, editing, and publishing into one cloud-based studio. It is aimed at podcasters, interviewers, webinar hosts, and creators who want participant tracks recorded locally for post-production.…

Read the review →

For podcasters, interviewers, co-hosts, and video creators recording remotely, Iris.fm provides browser-based recording with separate local audio and video files for each participant. Guests join through a link without installing an app,…

Read the review →
  1. RiversideVirtual Recording Studio Software 8.9Free plan · 14-day trial
  2. Iris.fmVirtual Recording Studio Software 7.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Riverside — where it wins

    • Records separate audio and video tracks locally on each participant’s device
    • Combines text-based editing, transcription, AI clips, and show notes
    • Supports 4K video, streaming, podcast hosting, and publishing integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Free exports include a watermark and video is limited to 720p
    • Free multi-track recording is capped at 2 hours
    • Separate-track downloads and streaming features require paid plans
  • Iris.fm — where it wins

    • Records separate local audio and video tracks for each participant
    • Supports live captions, automatic transcriptions, and progressive uploads
    • Offers web, iOS, and Android access with Drive and Dropbox uploads

    Where it doesn't

    • Cloud deployment means recordings are not self-hosted
    • Google Drive and Dropbox are the listed storage integrations
    • Email is the listed support channel

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update