Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · API Linting Tools

Spectral vs vacuum

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Spectral #1 in API Linting Tools 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 5 features Visit Spectral
vacuum #4 in API Linting Tools 7.9/10 Open source ✓ 0 of 5 features Visit vacuum

Spectral leads on 0 checks, vacuum on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreSpectral · 8.8/10
  • Free planonly Spectral

Spectral scores higher on our rubric for api linting tools: 8.8 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #4.

Spectral is the better fit for teams needing customizable OpenAPI and AsyncAPI linting. vacuum is the better fit for teams wanting broad API linting and reporting.

  • Spectral fits best

    Teams needing customizable OpenAPI and AsyncAPI linting

  • vacuum fits best

    Teams wanting broad API linting and reporting

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Spectral 8.8/10 Visit ↗ vacuum 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 7.9
Ranking #1 in API Linting Tools #4 in API Linting Tools
Best for Teams needing customizable OpenAPI and AsyncAPI linting Teams wanting broad API linting and reporting
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Open source
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux macOS, Linux
Support Community, Docs Community, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Spectral 0/5 · vacuum 0/5
OpenAPI linting Not checked yet Not checked yet
AsyncAPI linting Not checked yet Not checked yet
GraphQL schema linting Not checked yet Not checked yet
Custom rules Not checked yet Not checked yet
CI integration Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Built-in rulesets cover both OpenAPI and AsyncAPI.
  • Custom rulesets and JavaScript or TypeScript functions extend linting.
  • Works in CLI, JavaScript, CI, VS Code and JetBrains workflows.
  • Lints OpenAPI, AsyncAPI 3 and JSON Schema documents
  • Supports Spectral-compatible rulesets and language-server integration
  • Adds dashboards, offline HTML reports and CI/CD workflows
Cons
  • Focused on linting; it does not include a mock server.
  • Requires teams to define and maintain custom rules for their conventions.
  • Support is through community resources and documentation.
  • Primarily a CLI and Go library, not a hosted API design workspace
  • Requires teams to integrate it into local development or pipelines
  • Support channels are community and documentation
Our verdict

Spectral is an open-source linter for JSON and YAML API descriptions, aimed at developers and API teams that want to enforce style guides across local work, editors and Git-based processes. It includes built-in rulesets for OpenAPI and…

Read the review →

vacuum is an open-source command-line tool and Go library for developers and API teams that want automated quality checks on API specifications. Its scope spans OpenAPI, AsyncAPI 3 and JSON Schema, making it a fit for teams working across…

Read the review →
  1. SpectralAPI Linting Tools 8.8Free plan
  2. vacuumAPI Linting Tools 7.9Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Spectral — where it wins

    • Built-in rulesets cover both OpenAPI and AsyncAPI.
    • Custom rulesets and JavaScript or TypeScript functions extend linting.
    • Works in CLI, JavaScript, CI, VS Code and JetBrains workflows.

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on linting; it does not include a mock server.
    • Requires teams to define and maintain custom rules for their conventions.
    • Support is through community resources and documentation.
  • vacuum — where it wins

    • Lints OpenAPI, AsyncAPI 3 and JSON Schema documents
    • Supports Spectral-compatible rulesets and language-server integration
    • Adds dashboards, offline HTML reports and CI/CD workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Primarily a CLI and Go library, not a hosted API design workspace
    • Requires teams to integrate it into local development or pipelines
    • Support channels are community and documentation

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update