Head-to-head · Domain Registration Providers
Spaceship vs Name.com
Spaceship leads on 0 checks, Name.com on 0, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreSpaceship · 8.7/10
Spaceship scores higher on our rubric for domain registration providers: 8.7 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #6.
Spaceship is the better fit for established buyers prioritizing inexpensive renewals. Name.com is the better fit for established users needing API and bulk DNS controls.
- Spaceship fits best
Established buyers prioritizing inexpensive renewals
- Name.com fits best
Established users needing API and bulk DNS controls
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Spaceship 8.7/10 Visit ↗ | Name.com 8.6/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Ranking | #5 in Domain Registration Providers | #6 in Domain Registration Providers |
| Best for | Established buyers prioritizing inexpensive renewals | Established users needing API and bulk DNS controls |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Free plan | Not checked yet | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Features Spaceship 3/4 · Name.com 3/4 | ||
| WHOIS privacy | ✓ | ✓ |
| DNSSEC | ✓ | ✓ |
| API access | ✓ | ✓ |
| Domain forwarding | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| TLD coverage | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Support channels | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Spaceship is a web- and API-based domain registrar for individuals, businesses, and domain investors. Its core service covers domain registration, transfers, portfolio management, DNS and nameserver configuration, DNSSEC settings, domain… Read the review → |
Name.com is an ICANN-accredited domain registrar for individuals, businesses, and entrepreneurs. Its web and API offerings cover domain search and registration across hundreds of extensions, transfers, renewals, DNS record management, URL… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Spaceship — where it wins
- Registration across hundreds of TLDs with domain transfer support
- Free WHOIS privacy for eligible domains plus DNSSEC settings
- Bulk renewals, transfers, portfolio tools, and documented API access
Where it doesn't
- WHOIS privacy applies only to eligible domains
- One-year renewal with transfers is limited to eligible domains
- API functionality is focused on domain and DNS operations
Name.com — where it wins
- Registration across hundreds of domain extensions
- REST API for domains, DNS records, and related services
- Bulk domain settings plus DNS changes, DNSSEC, and privacy tools
Where it doesn't
- No free plan is available
- WHOIS privacy applies only to eligible domains
- DNSSEC configuration is limited to eligible domains
- Spaceship8.7/10 · Paid
A domain registrar with broad TLD coverage, portfolio controls, and domain and DNS APIs.
Visit SpaceshipFull verdict → - Name.com8.6/10 · Paid
A paid registrar for established users who need API access and bulk DNS control.
Visit Name.comFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Cloudflare Registrar vs Spaceship
- Cloudflare Registrar vs Name.com
- Gandi vs Name.com
- IONOS Domains vs Spaceship
- IONOS Domains vs Name.com
- NameSilo vs Name.com
- Spaceship vs OVHcloud Domains
- Name.com vs OVHcloud Domains
All domain registration providers comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update




