Head-to-head · Uptime Monitoring Software
SolidPing vs Hyperping
SolidPing leads on 1 check, Hyperping on 1, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreSolidPing · 9.4/10
- Free planboth
- Free trialonly Hyperping
- Most featuresHyperping · 3 of 3
SolidPing scores higher on our rubric for uptime monitoring software: 9.4 against 9.3 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #2.
SolidPing leads on monitor limit: 1000 monitors versus 50 monitors. Hyperping leads on monitoring locations: 18 locations versus 6 locations.
SolidPing is the better fit for teams wanting open-source, broad service monitoring. Hyperping is the better fit for teams wanting deep hosted monitoring coverage.
- SolidPing fits best
Teams wanting open-source, broad service monitoring
- Hyperping fits best
Teams wanting deep hosted monitoring coverage
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | SolidPing 9.4/10 Visit ↗ | Hyperping 9.3/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.4 | 9.3 |
| Ranking | #1 in Uptime Monitoring Software | #2 in Uptime Monitoring Software |
| Best for | Teams wanting open-source, broad service monitoring | Teams wanting deep hosted monitoring coverage |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | €5/mo | $24/mo |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | 14 days |
| Deployment | Cloud, Desktop, Self-hosted | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web, Linux, Windows | Web |
| Integrations | 16 integrations | 13 integrations |
| Features SolidPing 2/3 · Hyperping 3/3 | ||
| SSL expiry alerts | ✓ | ✓ |
| Keyword monitoring | Not checked yet | ✓ (best) |
| Server monitoring | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Monitor limit | 1000 monitors (best) | 50 monitors |
| Check interval | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Monitoring locations | 6 locations | 18 locations (best) |
| Alert channels | Slack, Discord, Microsoft Teams, Google Chat, Mattermost, Matrix, Zulip, Telegram, Email, Webhooks, PagerDuty, ntfy, Gotify, Pushover, Web Push, SMS, voice via Twilio | email, Slack, Microsoft Teams, PagerDuty, OpsGenie, Google Chat, SMS, phone calls, Discord, Telegram, webhooks, JSM, API |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | SolidPing is an open-source uptime and availability monitoring platform for teams responsible for websites, network services, databases, infrastructure, and private services. It is available as a self-hosted deployment or through SolidPing… Read the review → |
Hyperping brings uptime and reliability monitoring, status pages, incident management, and on-call workflows together for teams responsible for websites, APIs, DNS records, servers, and scheduled jobs. Its hosted checks run from 18 global… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
SolidPing — where it wins
- Checks websites, networks, databases, containers, and messaging services
- Offers six hosted regions, distributed workers, and up to 1,000 monitors on Starter
- Combines status pages, on-call schedules, and many alert integrations
Where it doesn't
- Free plan is limited to 100 monitors and 10 check executions per minute
- Hosted SMS, voice, and WhatsApp alerts are not included in hosted plans
- Self-hosting requires deployment with SQLite or PostgreSQL
Hyperping — where it wins
- Checks services from 18 global locations across many protocols and regions.
- Combines server, cron, SSL, keyword, and Playwright browser monitoring.
- Status pages, on-call schedules, and escalation policies support incident response.
Where it doesn't
- Free is limited to 20 monitors, one seat, and a 5-minute check interval.
- Essentials starts at $24 per month billed annually for 50 monitors.
- Higher limits and more seats or status pages require pricier or custom plans.
- SolidPing9.4/10 · Free plan
Broad protocol coverage, status pages, and on-call tools, with hosted plans from €5 per month.
Visit SolidPingFull verdict → - Hyperping9.3/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial
Broad hosted checks and response workflows, with paid plans starting at $24 per month billed annually.
Visit HyperpingFull verdict →
More comparisons
- SolidPing vs Uptimia
- SolidPing vs Checkmate
- SolidPing vs Kuvasz Uptime
- SolidPing vs UptimeRobot
- SolidPing vs StatusCake
- SolidPing vs Pulsetic
- Hyperping vs Uptimia
- Hyperping vs Checkmate
All uptime monitoring software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update







