Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Scrum Software

Shortcut vs Azure Boards

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Shortcut #5 in Scrum Software 7.3/10 Free plan · paid from $8.50/user/mo (annual) · 14-day trial Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Shortcut
Azure Boards #6 in Scrum Software 7.0/10 Free plan · paid from $6/user/mo · 30-day trial Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Azure Boards

Shortcut leads on 0 checks, Azure Boards on 5, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreShortcut · 7.3/10
  • Lowest starting priceAzure Boards · $6/user/mo
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresAzure Boards · 4 of 4

Shortcut scores higher on our rubric for scrum software: 7.3 against 7.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #6.

Azure Boards is cheaper to start at $6/user/mo against $8.5/user/mo. Azure Boards offers sprint planning; Shortcut doesn't publish it. Azure Boards offers product backlog; Shortcut doesn't publish it. Azure Boards offers sprint reports; Shortcut doesn't publish it. Azure Boards offers scrum boards; Shortcut doesn't publish it.

Shortcut is the better fit for product teams coordinating work across agile workflows. Azure Boards is the better fit for small teams already using Microsoft development tools.

  • Shortcut fits best

    Product teams coordinating work across agile workflows

  • Azure Boards fits best

    Small teams already using Microsoft development tools

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Shortcut 7.3/10 Visit ↗ Azure Boards 7.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.3 7.0
Ranking #5 in Scrum Software #6 in Scrum Software
Best for Product teams coordinating work across agile workflows Small teams already using Microsoft development tools
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $8.5/user/mo $6/user/mo (best)
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Free trial length 14 days · no card needed 30 days
Deployment Cloud, Browser extension Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Community, Docs Docs
Integrations 1,000+ integrations 6 integrations
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Shortcut 0/4 · Azure Boards 4/4
Sprint planning Not published ✓ (best)
Product backlog Not published ✓ (best)
Sprint reports Not published ✓ (best)
Scrum boards Not published ✓ (best)
Specs
Free plan users Not published 5 users
Key integrations Not published GitHub, Microsoft Teams, Slack, Azure DevOps REST API, Excel, Power BI
Our review
Pros
  • Free plan supports up to 10 users with core planning features
  • Iterations, boards, roadmaps and flow reports in one workspace
  • Workflow automations and a broad integration ecosystem
  • Backlogs, sprint planning, boards, and iteration assignment support Scrum workflows
  • Burndown and velocity charts help teams monitor sprint progress
  • Links work items to GitHub commits, branches, and pull requests
Cons
  • No built-in time tracking
  • Team and Business cost more with monthly billing
  • Advanced objectives and reporting require the Business plan
  • Free Stakeholder access lacks sprint planning and other agile tools
  • Basic is $6 per user monthly after the first five users
  • The $52 Basic + Test Plans tier is a substantial step up for test features
Our verdict

Shortcut brings software planning and delivery work together through Stories, Epics, Kanban boards, roadmaps, iterations and Objectives. Product, engineering, design and leadership teams can use it to coordinate work across sprints and…

Read the review →

Azure Boards is a work-tracking service within Azure DevOps for software teams using Scrum or other agile processes. Product and sprint backlogs, work items, boards, taskboards, and iteration assignment cover the core planning cycle, while…

Read the review →
  1. ShortcutScrum Software 7.3Free plan · paid from $8.50/user/mo (annual) · 14-day trial
  2. Azure BoardsScrum Software 7.0Free plan · paid from $6/user/mo · 30-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Shortcut — where it wins

    • Free plan supports up to 10 users with core planning features
    • Iterations, boards, roadmaps and flow reports in one workspace
    • Workflow automations and a broad integration ecosystem

    Where it doesn't

    • No built-in time tracking
    • Team and Business cost more with monthly billing
    • Advanced objectives and reporting require the Business plan
  • Azure Boards — where it wins

    • Backlogs, sprint planning, boards, and iteration assignment support Scrum workflows
    • Burndown and velocity charts help teams monitor sprint progress
    • Links work items to GitHub commits, branches, and pull requests

    Where it doesn't

    • Free Stakeholder access lacks sprint planning and other agile tools
    • Basic is $6 per user monthly after the first five users
    • The $52 Basic + Test Plans tier is a substantial step up for test features
  • Shortcut7.3/10 · Free plan · paid from $8.50/user/mo (annual) · 14-day trial

    Flexible Scrum workflows combine sprint planning, roadmaps, reporting and integrations.

    Visit ShortcutFull verdict →
  • Azure Boards7.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $6/user/mo · 30-day trial

    A Microsoft-centered Scrum tool with sprint planning, GitHub links, and a free Basic allowance.

    Visit Azure BoardsFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update