Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Database Proxy Software

ShardingSphere-Proxy vs TurbineProxy

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score ShardingSphere-Proxy #3 in Database Proxy Software 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit ShardingSphere
TurbineProxy #4 in Database Proxy Software 8.8/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit TurbineProxy

ShardingSphere-Proxy leads on 0 checks, TurbineProxy on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreShardingSphere-Proxy · 9.0/10
  • Free planboth

ShardingSphere-Proxy scores higher on our rubric for database proxy software: 9.0 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.

ShardingSphere-Proxy is the better fit for open-source multi-database proxy deployments. TurbineProxy is the better fit for modern MySQL/PostgreSQL proxy teams.

  • ShardingSphere-Proxy fits best

    Open-source multi-database proxy deployments

  • TurbineProxy fits best

    Modern MySQL/PostgreSQL proxy teams

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature ShardingSphere-Proxy 9.0/10 Visit ↗ TurbineProxy 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.8
Ranking #3 in Database Proxy Software #4 in Database Proxy Software
Best for Open-source multi-database proxy deployments Modern MySQL/PostgreSQL proxy teams
Pricing model Free Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted, Browser extension
Platforms Linux, Windows, macOS Web, Linux
Support Community, Docs Docs
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features ShardingSphere-Proxy 4/4 · TurbineProxy 4/4
Connection pooling ✓ ✓
Query routing ✓ ✓
Load balancing ✓ ✓
Automatic failover ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment model Self-hosted Self-hosted
Supported databases MySQL, PostgreSQL, openGauss, Firebird MySQL, PostgreSQL
Maximum connections Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Combines sharding, routing, pooling, and read/write splitting
  • Supports failover, load balancing, migration, and distributed transactions
  • Runs on Linux, Windows, and macOS with four protocol options
  • Combines pooling, query splitting, balancing, consistency, and failover
  • Adds SQL injection protection, query allowlisting, TLS, and health monitoring
  • Connects with Prometheus, Grafana, and developer AI tools
Cons
  • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to operate the proxy
  • No commercial paid tiers for teams seeking a managed plan
  • Protocol access centers on MySQL, PostgreSQL, openGauss, and Firebird
  • Requires a self-hosted deployment model
  • Supports MySQL and PostgreSQL rather than a broader database range
  • Traffic routing and consistency controls may require careful configuration
Our verdict

ShardingSphere-Proxy is a self-hosted transparent database proxy in the Apache ShardingSphere ecosystem. It provides a common proxy endpoint for applications and database tools while applying rules for sharding, query routing, read/write…

Read the review →

TurbineProxy is an open-source database proxy written in Rust for MySQL and PostgreSQL deployments. It sits between applications and database topologies, supporting standalone use and primary-replica arrangements. Its core audience is…

Read the review →
  1. ShardingSphere-ProxyDatabase Proxy Software 9.0Free plan
  2. TurbineProxyDatabase Proxy Software 8.8Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • ShardingSphere-Proxy — where it wins

    • Combines sharding, routing, pooling, and read/write splitting
    • Supports failover, load balancing, migration, and distributed transactions
    • Runs on Linux, Windows, and macOS with four protocol options

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to operate the proxy
    • No commercial paid tiers for teams seeking a managed plan
    • Protocol access centers on MySQL, PostgreSQL, openGauss, and Firebird

  • TurbineProxy — where it wins

    • Combines pooling, query splitting, balancing, consistency, and failover
    • Adds SQL injection protection, query allowlisting, TLS, and health monitoring
    • Connects with Prometheus, Grafana, and developer AI tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires a self-hosted deployment model
    • Supports MySQL and PostgreSQL rather than a broader database range
    • Traffic routing and consistency controls may require careful configuration

ShardingSphere-Proxy vs TurbineProxy: questions

Which is better for database proxy software, ShardingSphere-Proxy or TurbineProxy?

ShardingSphere-Proxy scores higher on our rubric for database proxy software: 9.0 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.

How do ShardingSphere-Proxy and TurbineProxy compare?

All 5 checks we put side by side come out level: neither leads on any.

Do ShardingSphere-Proxy and TurbineProxy have a free plan?

ShardingSphere-Proxy: Yes. TurbineProxy: Yes.

More comparisons

All database proxy software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update