Head-to-head · Static Site Hosting
Sevalla vs Miget
Sevalla leads on 0 checks, Miget on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreSevalla · 7.7/10
- Free planboth
Sevalla scores higher on our rubric for static site hosting: 7.7 against 7.1 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #8.
Sevalla is the better fit for static sites needing generous free usage. Miget is the better fit for developers wanting broad deployment and runtime options.
- Sevalla fits best
Static sites needing generous free usage
- Miget fits best
Developers wanting broad deployment and runtime options
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Sevalla 7.7/10 Visit ↗ | Miget 7.1/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 7.7 | 7.1 |
| Ranking | #4 in Static Site Hosting | #8 in Static Site Hosting |
| Best for | Static sites needing generous free usage | Developers wanting broad deployment and runtime options |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | Not published | $5/mo |
| Free plan | ✓ | ✓ |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Browser extension | Cloud |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Support | Email, Live chat, Community, Docs, Tickets | Email, Community, Docs · 24/7 |
| Compliance | SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR | ISO 27001, GDPR, 2FA |
| Integrations | 4 integrations | 6 integrations |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Sevalla 5/5 · Miget 5/5 | ||
| Git deployment | ✓ | ✓ |
| Preview deployments | ✓ | ✓ |
| Custom domains | ✓ | ✓ |
| Deployment rollbacks | ✓ | ✓ |
| Monorepo support | ✓ | ✓ |
| Specs | ||
| Build minutes | 600 min/mo | Not published |
| Bandwidth allowance | 100 GB/mo | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Sevalla is a Git-based hosting service for static websites, aimed at developers and teams publishing landing pages, documentation, blogs, and sites built with modern JavaScript frameworks or static site generators. It connects with GitHub,… Read the review → |
Miget is a cloud platform for static sites, applications, databases, workers, and preview environments. Its static-site service serves prebuilt HTML, CSS, and JavaScript through GitHub, Git Push, ZIP uploads, or SFTP. Developers can… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Sevalla — where it wins
- 600 build minutes and 100 GB bandwidth per month
- Pull-request previews, deployment history, and previous-commit redeploys
- Global delivery through 260+ PoP servers with automatic SSL
Where it doesn't
- Usage-based charges apply after included allowances
- Each site has a 1 GB size limit
- Focused on static sites rather than dynamic applications
Miget — where it wins
- Deploy via GitHub, Git Push, ZIP, or SFTP
- 33 framework generators, SPA mode, previews, and rollback
- Managed PostgreSQL, MySQL, and Valkey services
Where it doesn't
- The free resource requires a saved card
- Free capacity is limited to 256 MiB RAM and 1 GiB storage
- Paid plans use shared CPU and fixed storage tiers
- Sevalla7.7/10 · Free plan
A generous free tier for Git-driven static sites, with usage-based overages.
Visit SevallaFull verdict → - Miget7.1/10 · Free plan · paid from $5/mo · 30-day trial
A flexible static host with free sites, multiple deployment paths, and paid cloud resources.
Visit MigetFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Vercel vs Sevalla
- Vercel vs Miget
- Cloudflare Pages vs Sevalla
- Cloudflare Pages vs Miget
- Netlify vs Sevalla
- Netlify vs Miget
- Sevalla vs IONOS Deploy Now
- Sevalla vs GitLab Pages
All static site hosting comparisons → · Full ranking →
Guides on static site hosting
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






