Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Browser Testing Software

Selenium vs TestComplete

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Selenium #3 in Browser Testing Software 8.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Selenium
TestComplete #7 in Browser Testing Software 8.4/10 Pricing on request · 14-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 4 features Visit TestComplete

Selenium leads on 1 check, TestComplete on 0, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreSelenium · 8.9/10
  • Free planonly Selenium
  • Free trialonly TestComplete

Selenium scores higher on our rubric for browser testing software: 8.9 against 8.4 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #7.

Selenium offers free plan; TestComplete doesn't.

Selenium is the better fit for teams wanting mature, open-source automation. TestComplete is the better fit for windows teams preferring record-and-replay testing.

  • Selenium fits best

    Teams wanting mature, open-source automation

  • TestComplete fits best

    Windows teams preferring record-and-replay testing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Selenium 8.9/10 Visit ↗ TestComplete 8.4/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.9 8.4
Ranking #3 in Browser Testing Software #7 in Browser Testing Software
Best for Teams wanting mature, open-source automation Windows teams preferring record-and-replay testing
Pricing model Free Paid
Starting price Free plan Pricing on request · 14-day trial
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — 14 days
Deployment Self-hosted, Browser extension Desktop, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Chrome extension Windows
Support Community, Docs Phone, Community, Docs
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Selenium 0/4 · TestComplete 0/4
Live browser testing Not checked yet Not checked yet
Automated test execution Not checked yet Not checked yet
Real device testing Not checked yet Not checked yet
Visual regression Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Device coverage Not checked yet Not checked yet
Parallel sessions Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • WebDriver supports standard browser automation across multiple languages
  • Grid enables remote and parallel execution across machines and environments
  • Selenium IDE adds record-and-playback authoring for browser interactions
  • Script-free authoring plus JavaScript, Python, and VBScript support
  • Cross-browser, mobile web, desktop, and visual testing
  • Parallel execution and CI/CD integrations through CLI and REST API
Cons
  • Teams must pair Selenium with a separate language-specific test runner
  • Self-hosted execution requires teams to manage browsers and infrastructure
  • It is not a managed SaaS product with integrated commercial workflows
  • Windows is required for the product’s trial environment
  • Pricing uses a contact-sales model rather than published plan amounts
  • Parallel execution applies only to eligible web and mobile tests
Our verdict

Selenium is an open-source suite for automating web browsers, aimed primarily at developers and QA teams building regression and end-to-end tests. WebDriver provides a standard API for controlling browsers locally or remotely, with…

Read the review →

TestComplete is a Windows-based UI test automation tool for development and QA teams testing desktop, web, and mobile applications. Its authoring options cover script-free record-and-replay alongside JavaScript, Python, and VBScript,…

Read the review →
  1. SeleniumBrowser Testing Software 8.9Free plan
  2. TestCompleteBrowser Testing Software 8.4Pricing on request · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Selenium — where it wins

    • WebDriver supports standard browser automation across multiple languages
    • Grid enables remote and parallel execution across machines and environments
    • Selenium IDE adds record-and-playback authoring for browser interactions

    Where it doesn't

    • Teams must pair Selenium with a separate language-specific test runner
    • Self-hosted execution requires teams to manage browsers and infrastructure
    • It is not a managed SaaS product with integrated commercial workflows
  • TestComplete — where it wins

    • Script-free authoring plus JavaScript, Python, and VBScript support
    • Cross-browser, mobile web, desktop, and visual testing
    • Parallel execution and CI/CD integrations through CLI and REST API

    Where it doesn't

    • Windows is required for the product’s trial environment
    • Pricing uses a contact-sales model rather than published plan amounts
    • Parallel execution applies only to eligible web and mobile tests
  • Selenium8.9/10 · Free plan

    A mature open-source suite for teams building cross-browser automation in code.

    Visit SeleniumFull verdict →
  • TestComplete8.4/10 · Pricing on request · 14-day trial

    A Windows-focused test automation suite combining record-and-replay with code-based testing.

    Visit TestCompleteFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update