Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Automated Testing

Selenium vs OpenText Functional Testing

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Selenium #2 in Automated Testing 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Selenium
OpenText Functional Testing #5 in Automated Testing 9.0/10 Pricing on request · 30-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 2 features Visit OpenText

Selenium leads on 1 check, OpenText Functional Testing on 0, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreSelenium · 9.2/10
  • Free planonly Selenium
  • Free trialonly OpenText Functional Testing

Selenium scores higher on our rubric for automated testing: 9.2 against 9.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #5.

Selenium offers free plan; OpenText Functional Testing doesn't.

Selenium is the better fit for teams building broad browser automation in-house. OpenText Functional Testing is the better fit for large organizations testing complex application estates.

  • Selenium fits best

    Teams building broad browser automation in-house

  • OpenText Functional Testing fits best

    Large organizations testing complex application estates

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Selenium 9.2/10 Visit ↗ OpenText Functional Testing 9.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 9.0
Ranking #2 in Automated Testing #5 in Automated Testing
Best for Teams building broad browser automation in-house Large organizations testing complex application estates
Pricing model Free Paid
Starting price Free plan Pricing on request · 30-day trial
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — 30 days
Deployment Self-hosted, Browser extension Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Chrome extension Windows, Linux
Support Community, Docs Phone, Community, Docs, Tickets
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Selenium 0/2 · OpenText Functional Testing 0/2
No-code authoring Not checked yet Not checked yet
Parallel execution Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Test types Not checked yet Not checked yet
Supported platforms Not checked yet Not checked yet
Integrations Not checked yet Not checked yet
Monthly test runs Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Free, open-source WebDriver automation with language-specific bindings
  • Grid distributes parallel tests across browsers, systems, and machines
  • IDE adds record-and-playback, while Selenium Manager handles drivers and browsers
  • Tests web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, composite, and packaged apps
  • AI object recognition plus visual regression and computer-vision identification
  • Parallel, distributed, Docker-based, cross-browser, and cloud-browser execution
Cons
  • Self-hosted runners require teams to manage their own infrastructure
  • Code-first authoring may require programming expertise for larger suites
  • Community and documentation support replace vendor-managed service channels
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • No free plan is available
  • Breadth may exceed the needs of narrow, web-only testing teams
Our verdict

Selenium is an open-source browser automation project for teams that need coded testing across browsers and operating systems. Its WebDriver API controls major web browsers through language-specific bindings, while Selenium IDE offers a…

Read the review →

OpenText Functional Testing is an automated functional and end-to-end testing product for QA and development teams working across complex application estates. Its coverage spans web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, composite, SAP, and…

Read the review →
  1. SeleniumAutomated Testing 9.2Free plan
  2. OpenText Functional TestingAutomated Testing 9.0Pricing on request · 30-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Selenium — where it wins

    • Free, open-source WebDriver automation with language-specific bindings
    • Grid distributes parallel tests across browsers, systems, and machines
    • IDE adds record-and-playback, while Selenium Manager handles drivers and browsers

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted runners require teams to manage their own infrastructure
    • Code-first authoring may require programming expertise for larger suites
    • Community and documentation support replace vendor-managed service channels
  • OpenText Functional Testing — where it wins

    • Tests web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, composite, and packaged apps
    • AI object recognition plus visual regression and computer-vision identification
    • Parallel, distributed, Docker-based, cross-browser, and cloud-browser execution

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • No free plan is available
    • Breadth may exceed the needs of narrow, web-only testing teams
  • Selenium9.2/10 · Free plan

    A flexible, code-first foundation for teams running cross-browser tests themselves.

    Visit SeleniumFull verdict →
  • OpenText Functional Testing9.0/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial

    Broad, AI-assisted automation for complex enterprise application estates.

    Visit OpenTextFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update