Head-to-head · Automated Testing
Selenium vs OpenText Functional Testing
Selenium leads on 1 check, OpenText Functional Testing on 0, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Free planonly Selenium
Our editors rank Selenium at #2 and OpenText Functional Testing at #6 for automated testing; Selenium and OpenText Functional Testing have no rubric score yet (facts researched, not yet scored), so the checks below decide.
Selenium offers free plan; OpenText Functional Testing doesn't.
Selenium is the better fit for teams building broad browser automation in-house. OpenText Functional Testing is the better fit for large organizations testing complex application estates.
- Selenium fits best
Teams building broad browser automation in-house
- OpenText Functional Testing fits best
Large organizations testing complex application estates
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Selenium —/10 Visit ↗ | OpenText Functional Testing —/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | — | — |
| Ranking | #2 in Automated Testing | #6 in Automated Testing |
| Best for | Teams building broad browser automation in-house | Large organizations testing complex application estates |
| Pricing model | Free | Paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | ✓ (best) | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Self-hosted, Browser extension | Self-hosted, Desktop |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Chrome extension | Windows, Linux |
| Support | Community, Docs | Phone, Community, Docs, Tickets |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Selenium 0/2 · OpenText Functional Testing 0/2 | ||
| No-code authoring | Not published | Not published |
| Parallel execution | Not published | Not published |
| Specs | ||
| Test types | Not published | Not published |
| Supported platforms | Not published | Not published |
| Integrations | Not published | Not published |
| Monthly test runs | Not published | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Selenium is an open-source browser automation project for teams that need coded testing across browsers and operating systems. Its WebDriver API controls major web browsers through language-specific bindings, while Selenium IDE offers a… Read the review → |
OpenText Functional Testing is an automated functional and end-to-end testing product for QA and development teams working across complex application estates. Its coverage spans web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, composite, SAP, and… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Selenium — where it wins
- Free, open-source WebDriver automation with language-specific bindings
- Grid distributes parallel tests across browsers, systems, and machines
- IDE adds record-and-playback, while Selenium Manager handles drivers and browsers
Where it doesn't
- Self-hosted runners require teams to manage their own infrastructure
- Code-first authoring may require programming expertise for larger suites
- Community and documentation support replace vendor-managed service channels
OpenText Functional Testing — where it wins
- Tests web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, composite, and packaged apps
- AI object recognition plus visual regression and computer-vision identification
- Parallel, distributed, Docker-based, cross-browser, and cloud-browser execution
Where it doesn't
- Pricing requires contacting sales
- No free plan is available
- Breadth may exceed the needs of narrow, web-only testing teams
- Selenium—/10 · Free plan
A flexible, code-first foundation for teams running cross-browser tests themselves.
Visit SeleniumFull verdict → - OpenText Functional Testing—/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial
Broad, AI-assisted automation for complex enterprise application estates.
Visit OpenTextFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Playwright vs OpenText Functional Testing
- Selenium vs BrowserStack Automate
- Selenium vs Tricentis Tosca
- Selenium vs Appium
- BrowserStack Automate vs OpenText Functional Testing
- Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing
- OpenText Functional Testing vs Robot Framework
- OpenText Functional Testing vs Appium
All automated testing comparisons → · Full ranking →
Guides on automated testing
- How to Use Selenium with Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) for Automated TestingAug 2026
- Microsoft Playwright for Automated Testing: Setup, Examples, Features, and AlternativesAug 2026
- How to Integrate Playwright With Azure DevOps for Automated TestingAug 2026
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026





