Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · Automated Testing

Selenium vs OpenText Functional Testing

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Selenium #2 in Automated Testing —/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Selenium
OpenText Functional Testing #6 in Automated Testing —/10 Pricing on request · 30-day trial ✓ 0 of 2 features Visit OpenText

Selenium leads on 1 check, OpenText Functional Testing on 0, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Free planonly Selenium

Our editors rank Selenium at #2 and OpenText Functional Testing at #6 for automated testing; Selenium and OpenText Functional Testing have no rubric score yet (facts researched, not yet scored), so the checks below decide.

Selenium offers free plan; OpenText Functional Testing doesn't.

Selenium is the better fit for teams building broad browser automation in-house. OpenText Functional Testing is the better fit for large organizations testing complex application estates.

  • Selenium fits best

    Teams building broad browser automation in-house

  • OpenText Functional Testing fits best

    Large organizations testing complex application estates

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Selenium —/10 Visit ↗ OpenText Functional Testing —/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score — —
Ranking #2 in Automated Testing #6 in Automated Testing
Best for Teams building broad browser automation in-house Large organizations testing complex application estates
Pricing model Free Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted, Browser extension Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux, Chrome extension Windows, Linux
Support Community, Docs Phone, Community, Docs, Tickets
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Selenium 0/2 · OpenText Functional Testing 0/2
No-code authoring Not published Not published
Parallel execution Not published Not published
Specs
Test types Not published Not published
Supported platforms Not published Not published
Integrations Not published Not published
Monthly test runs Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Free, open-source WebDriver automation with language-specific bindings
  • Grid distributes parallel tests across browsers, systems, and machines
  • IDE adds record-and-playback, while Selenium Manager handles drivers and browsers
  • Tests web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, composite, and packaged apps
  • AI object recognition plus visual regression and computer-vision identification
  • Parallel, distributed, Docker-based, cross-browser, and cloud-browser execution
Cons
  • Self-hosted runners require teams to manage their own infrastructure
  • Code-first authoring may require programming expertise for larger suites
  • Community and documentation support replace vendor-managed service channels
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • No free plan is available
  • Breadth may exceed the needs of narrow, web-only testing teams
Our verdict

Selenium is an open-source browser automation project for teams that need coded testing across browsers and operating systems. Its WebDriver API controls major web browsers through language-specific bindings, while Selenium IDE offers a…

Read the review →

OpenText Functional Testing is an automated functional and end-to-end testing product for QA and development teams working across complex application estates. Its coverage spans web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, composite, SAP, and…

Read the review →
  1. SeleniumAutomated Testing —Free plan
  2. OpenText Functional TestingAutomated Testing —Pricing on request · 30-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Selenium — where it wins

    • Free, open-source WebDriver automation with language-specific bindings
    • Grid distributes parallel tests across browsers, systems, and machines
    • IDE adds record-and-playback, while Selenium Manager handles drivers and browsers

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted runners require teams to manage their own infrastructure
    • Code-first authoring may require programming expertise for larger suites
    • Community and documentation support replace vendor-managed service channels
  • OpenText Functional Testing — where it wins

    • Tests web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, composite, and packaged apps
    • AI object recognition plus visual regression and computer-vision identification
    • Parallel, distributed, Docker-based, cross-browser, and cloud-browser execution

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • No free plan is available
    • Breadth may exceed the needs of narrow, web-only testing teams
  • Selenium—/10 · Free plan

    A flexible, code-first foundation for teams running cross-browser tests themselves.

    Visit SeleniumFull verdict →
  • OpenText Functional Testing—/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial

    Broad, AI-assisted automation for complex enterprise application estates.

    Visit OpenTextFull verdict →

More comparisons

Guides on automated testing

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026