Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Quote-to-Cash Software

SAP CPQ vs Conga Revenue Lifecycle Management

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score SAP CPQ #3 in Quote-to-Cash Software 9.0/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 5 features Visit SAP CPQ
Conga Revenue Lifecycle Management #4 in Quote-to-Cash Software 8.9/10 Pricing on request ✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Conga

SAP CPQ leads on 0 checks, Conga Revenue Lifecycle Management on 5, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreSAP CPQ · 9.0/10
  • Most featuresConga Revenue Lifecycle Management · 5 of 5

SAP CPQ scores higher on our rubric for quote-to-cash software: 9.0 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #4.

Conga Revenue Lifecycle Management offers contract workflows; SAP CPQ doesn't publish it. Conga Revenue Lifecycle Management offers order management; SAP CPQ doesn't publish it. Conga Revenue Lifecycle Management offers subscription management; SAP CPQ doesn't publish it. Conga Revenue Lifecycle Management offers billing automation; SAP CPQ doesn't publish it. Conga Revenue Lifecycle Management offers collection workflows; SAP CPQ doesn't publish it.

SAP CPQ is the better fit for mid-market and enterprise SAP-centric quoting teams. Conga Revenue Lifecycle Management is the better fit for mid-market and enterprise contract-to-cash teams.

  • SAP CPQ fits best

    Mid-market and enterprise SAP-centric quoting teams

  • Conga Revenue Lifecycle Management fits best

    Mid-market and enterprise contract-to-cash teams

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature SAP CPQ 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Conga Revenue Lifecycle Management 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.9
Ranking #3 in Quote-to-Cash Software #4 in Quote-to-Cash Software
Best for Mid-market and enterprise SAP-centric quoting teams Mid-market and enterprise contract-to-cash teams
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan — —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Platforms Web Web
Integrations 6 integrations 4 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features SAP CPQ 0/5 · Conga Revenue Lifecycle Management 5/5
Contract workflows Not published ✓ (best)
Order management Not published ✓ (best)
Subscription management Not published ✓ (best)
Billing automation Not published ✓ (best)
Collection workflows Not published ✓ (best)
Specs
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Our review
Pros
  • Models complex products, services, dependencies, and consumption schedules
  • Applies customer-, product-, and channel-specific pricing with discount approvals
  • Generates branded proposals and connects with SAP systems and Salesforce
  • Links product configuration, quotes, approvals, contracts and signatures.
  • Covers order fulfillment, invoicing, billing reminders and renewals.
  • Integrates with Salesforce, SAP, NetSuite and HubSpot.
Cons
  • Standard edition requires a minimum purchase of 50 users
  • Standard edition and add-ons are sold through contact sales
  • Focused on quoting rather than the breadth of a full billing suite
  • Pricing requires contacting Conga; no free plan is available.
  • Cloud deployment only; no other deployment option is listed.
  • Its broad workflow scope may exceed the needs of teams seeking only quoting.
Our verdict

For sales teams and partners handling complex B2B offerings, SAP CPQ supports guided product and service configuration, pricing controls, approvals, and branded proposal generation in the cloud. Its rules can model product dependencies,…

Read the review →

Conga Revenue Lifecycle Management connects revenue processes from proposals and quotes through contract execution, fulfillment and renewal. It is aimed at cross-functional revenue operations, with sales teams configuring products and…

Read the review →
  1. SAP CPQQuote-to-Cash Software 9.0Pricing on request
  2. Conga Revenue Lifecycle ManagementQuote-to-Cash Software 8.9Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • SAP CPQ — where it wins

    • Models complex products, services, dependencies, and consumption schedules
    • Applies customer-, product-, and channel-specific pricing with discount approvals
    • Generates branded proposals and connects with SAP systems and Salesforce

    Where it doesn't

    • Standard edition requires a minimum purchase of 50 users
    • Standard edition and add-ons are sold through contact sales
    • Focused on quoting rather than the breadth of a full billing suite

  • Conga Revenue Lifecycle Management — where it wins

    • Links product configuration, quotes, approvals, contracts and signatures.
    • Covers order fulfillment, invoicing, billing reminders and renewals.
    • Integrates with Salesforce, SAP, NetSuite and HubSpot.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting Conga; no free plan is available.
    • Cloud deployment only; no other deployment option is listed.
    • Its broad workflow scope may exceed the needs of teams seeking only quoting.
  • SAP CPQ9.0/10 · Pricing on request

    A focused cloud CPQ for complex SAP-centric sales, not a full billing suite.

    Visit SAP CPQFull verdict →
  • Conga Revenue Lifecycle Management8.9/10 · Pricing on request

    A cloud revenue platform linking quote creation to billing, obligations and renewals.

    Visit CongaFull verdict →

More comparisons

All Quote-to-Cash software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update