Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Test Analytics Software

ReportPortal vs Flakiness.io

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score ReportPortal #3 in Test Analytics Software 9.2/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 4 of 4 features Visit ReportPortal
Flakiness.io #8 in Test Analytics Software 8.7/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Flakiness.io

ReportPortal leads on 0 checks, Flakiness.io on 1, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreReportPortal · 9.2/10
  • Lowest starting priceFlakiness.io · $49/mo
  • Free planboth
  • Free trialonly ReportPortal

ReportPortal scores higher on our rubric for test analytics software: 9.2 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #8.

Flakiness.io is cheaper to start at $49/mo against $569/mo.

ReportPortal is the better fit for teams needing AI-rich, self-hosted analytics. Flakiness.io is the better fit for teams needing deep flake investigation.

  • ReportPortal fits best

    Teams needing AI-rich, self-hosted analytics

  • Flakiness.io fits best

    Teams needing deep flake investigation

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature ReportPortal 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Flakiness.io 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.7
Ranking #3 in Test Analytics Software #8 in Test Analytics Software
Best for Teams needing AI-rich, self-hosted analytics Teams needing deep flake investigation
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free plan + paid
Starting price $569/mo $49/mo (best)
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial 30 days —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Email, Community, Docs Email, Docs
Integrations 13 integrations 13 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features ReportPortal 4/4 · Flakiness.io 4/4
Flaky-test detection ✓ ✓
Failure analysis ✓ ✓
Execution trend reports ✓ ✓
Self-hosted deployment ✓ ✓
Specs
Supported frameworks TestNG, JBehave, Pytest, Robot Framework, Playwright, Postman, NUnit, VSTest, SpecFlow, xUnit, Reqnroll, Cypress, CucumberJS, CodeceptJS, WebdriverIO, Mocha, Jest, Vitest, Nightwatch, Jasmine, TestCafe Playwright, Pytest, Vitest, Jest, CucumberJS, Bun, Rust, JUnit XML
CI/CD integrations Azure DevOps, Bitrise CI/CD, CircleCI, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, Jenkins GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD
Data retention Not checked yet 180 days
Our review
Pros
  • AI-based failure reason detection and failure categorization
  • Self-hosted open-source edition with broad framework support
  • Artifacts, flaky-test reports, trends, and quality gates in one dashboard
  • Classifies regressions and flaky failures by commit and environment
  • Combines logs, screenshots, videos, traces, and HTML artifacts
  • Supports shard balancing, failure analysis, APIs, and AI-agent workflows
Cons
  • Paid plans start at $569 per package per month
  • Higher tiers add significant annual costs
  • Commercial capacity is split across distinct plan structures
  • Framework coverage centers on Playwright, Pytest, Vitest, Jest, and listed runners
  • CI integrations focus on GitHub Actions and GitLab CI/CD
  • Advanced plan differences are not clearly reflected in the listed highlights
Our verdict

ReportPortal is a test automation analytics and reporting platform for QA and DevOps teams managing results across multiple frameworks and CI/CD systems. It brings automated test results, logs, screenshots, videos, and other artifacts into…

Read the review →

Flakiness.io is a test analytics service for engineering teams working with GitHub or GitLab. It connects test results to commits and environments, helping teams distinguish regressions from flaky failures. Historical reports, execution…

Read the review →
  1. ReportPortalTest Analytics Software 9.2Free plan · 30-day trial
  2. Flakiness.ioTest Analytics Software 8.7Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • ReportPortal — where it wins

    • AI-based failure reason detection and failure categorization
    • Self-hosted open-source edition with broad framework support
    • Artifacts, flaky-test reports, trends, and quality gates in one dashboard

    Where it doesn't

    • Paid plans start at $569 per package per month
    • Higher tiers add significant annual costs
    • Commercial capacity is split across distinct plan structures
  • Flakiness.io — where it wins

    • Classifies regressions and flaky failures by commit and environment
    • Combines logs, screenshots, videos, traces, and HTML artifacts
    • Supports shard balancing, failure analysis, APIs, and AI-agent workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Framework coverage centers on Playwright, Pytest, Vitest, Jest, and listed runners
    • CI integrations focus on GitHub Actions and GitLab CI/CD
    • Advanced plan differences are not clearly reflected in the listed highlights

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update