Head-to-head · Agency Project Management Software
Productive vs Kantata
Productive leads on 1 check, Kantata on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreProductive · 5.7/10
- Most featuresProductive · 1 of 6
Our editors rank Productive at #1 and Kantata at #5 for agency project management software; Kantata has no rubric score yet (facts researched, not yet scored), so the checks below decide.
Productive offers time tracking; Kantata doesn't publish it.
Productive is the better fit for agencies wanting broad PSA coverage. Kantata is the better fit for midsize agencies needing enterprise PSA.
- Productive fits best
Agencies wanting broad PSA coverage
- Kantata fits best
Midsize agencies needing enterprise PSA
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Productive 5.7/10 Visit ↗ | Kantata —/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 5.7 | — |
| Ranking | #1 in Agency Project Management Software | #5 in Agency Project Management Software |
| Best for | Agencies wanting broad PSA coverage | Midsize agencies needing enterprise PSA |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | $10/user/mo | Not published |
| Free plan | — | Not published |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Desktop, Mobile | Cloud, Mobile |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, iOS, Android | Web, iOS, Android |
| Integrations | 23+ integrations | 12 integrations |
| Features Productive 1/6 · Kantata 0/6 | ||
| Client portal | Not published | Not published |
| Resource planning | Not published | Not published |
| Time tracking | ✓ (best) | Not published |
| Profitability reporting | Not published | Not published |
| Invoicing | Not published | Not published |
| Project budgets | Not published | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Productive is a professional services automation and project management platform for agencies, consultancies, and other service businesses. It brings project and task management together with budgeting, profitability tracking, resource… Read the review → |
Kantata is a professional services automation platform for consulting firms, agencies, and other services organizations. It brings project and task management together with Gantt charts, task dependencies, timelines, resource allocation,… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Productive — where it wins
- Covers budgets, profitability, resources, time, tasks, and client access
- Offers boards, lists, timelines, calendars, and Gantt layouts
- Includes web, desktop, mobile, API, automation, and AI capabilities
Where it doesn't
- No ongoing free plan; the trial lasts 14 days
- Advanced reporting, recurring budgets, and teams require Professional
- The broad feature set may exceed the needs of task-only teams
Kantata — where it wins
- Covers projects, resources, time, expenses, billing, and profitability
- Includes forecasting, business intelligence, and AI expertise features
- Offers web, iOS, Android, API access, and 12 integrations
Where it doesn't
- Contact-sales pricing makes plan comparison and budgeting harder
- Google Calendar integration was removed from Kantata OX
- Its broad PSA scope may exceed the needs of smaller agencies
- Productive5.7/10 · From $10/user/mo · 14-day trial
A broad agency PSA platform combining delivery, budgets, resources, time, and clients.
Visit ProductiveFull verdict → - Kantata—/10 · Pricing on request
A broad agency PSA suite for teams that need project and financial control.
Visit KantataFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Productive vs Scoro
- Productive vs Projectworks
- Productive vs Pike
- Productive vs Synergist
- Productive vs Workamajig
- Scoro vs Kantata
- Accelo vs Kantata
- Projectworks vs Kantata
All agency project management software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026






