Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Affordable Housing Software

PHA-Web vs Fairmark

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 7 checks side by side
Higher score PHA-Web #4 in Affordable Housing Software 9.0/10 Pricing on request ✓ 6 of 6 features Visit PHA-Web

PHA-Web leads on 0 checks, Fairmark on 0, and 7 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 7 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scorePHA-Web · 9.0/10

PHA-Web scores higher on our rubric for affordable housing software: 9.0 against 8.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #6.

PHA-Web is the better fit for public housing agencies needing full operations. Fairmark is the better fit for voucher agencies wanting transparent pricing.

  • PHA-Web fits best

    Public housing agencies needing full operations

  • Fairmark fits best

    Voucher agencies wanting transparent pricing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature PHA-Web 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Fairmark 8.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.8
Ranking #4 in Affordable Housing Software #6 in Affordable Housing Software
Best for Public housing agencies needing full operations Voucher agencies wanting transparent pricing
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request $6,000/yr
Free plan Not checked yet —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Mobile Cloud
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web
Support Phone, Tickets Email
Integrations 5 integrations 8 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features PHA-Web 6/6 · Fairmark 6/6
Eligibility workflows ✓ ✓
Recertification ✓ ✓
Waitlist management ✓ ✓
Rent calculations ✓ ✓
Compliance reporting ✓ ✓
Resident portal ✓ ✓
Specs
Program coverage Multiple Multiple
Our review
Pros
  • Covers applications, waitlists, certifications, rents, HAP, and compliance.
  • Includes applicant, tenant, and landlord portals across web and mobile.
  • Adds mobile inspections, work orders, documents, signatures, and reporting.
  • Covers eligibility, waitlists, inspections, recertifications, and HUD workflows
  • Includes staff, landlord, and participant portals
  • Offers APIs, HUD integrations, payments, SSO, and BI exports
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting sales instead of selecting a published plan.
  • Its broad scope may exceed the needs of simpler housing operations.
  • It is proprietary rather than open source for code-level customization.
  • Focused on voucher and public housing rather than full property management
  • No free plan is available
  • Annual pricing scales by voucher volume
Our verdict

PHA-Web is a cloud-based housing management system for public housing authorities managing multiple housing programs and operational functions. It brings together waiting-list creation and income qualification, online applicant services,…

Read the review →

Fairmark is a web-based operating platform for public housing agencies running Housing Choice Voucher and public housing programs. It brings together eligibility and income calculations, family and tenant profiles, waitlists, rent…

Read the review →
  1. PHA-WebAffordable Housing Software 9.0Pricing on request
  2. FairmarkAffordable Housing Software 8.8Paid

Strengths and trade-offs

  • PHA-Web — where it wins

    • Covers applications, waitlists, certifications, rents, HAP, and compliance.
    • Includes applicant, tenant, and landlord portals across web and mobile.
    • Adds mobile inspections, work orders, documents, signatures, and reporting.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales instead of selecting a published plan.
    • Its broad scope may exceed the needs of simpler housing operations.
    • It is proprietary rather than open source for code-level customization.
  • Fairmark — where it wins

    • Covers eligibility, waitlists, inspections, recertifications, and HUD workflows
    • Includes staff, landlord, and participant portals
    • Offers APIs, HUD integrations, payments, SSO, and BI exports

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on voucher and public housing rather than full property management
    • No free plan is available
    • Annual pricing scales by voucher volume
  • PHA-Web9.0/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad operations platform for agencies managing housing programs, compliance, and residents.

    Visit PHA-WebFull verdict →
  • Fairmark8.8/10 · Paid

    A broad voucher-operations platform with transparent annual pricing for housing agencies.

    Visit FairmarkFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update