Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Repository Management Software

Perforce P4 (Helix Core) vs Perforce TeamHub

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score Perforce P4 (Helix Core) #2 in Repository Management Software 9.0/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Perforce
Perforce TeamHub #6 in Repository Management Software 8.6/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 2 features Visit Perforce

Perforce P4 (Helix Core) leads on 1 check, Perforce TeamHub on 0, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scorePerforce P4 (Helix Core) · 9.0/10
  • Free planonly Perforce P4 (Helix Core)

Perforce P4 (Helix Core) scores higher on our rubric for repository management software: 9.0 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #6.

Perforce P4 (Helix Core) offers free plan; Perforce TeamHub doesn't.

Perforce P4 (Helix Core) is the better fit for large files and asset-heavy development teams. Perforce TeamHub is the better fit for teams managing mixed repositories and artifacts.

  • Perforce P4 (Helix Core) fits best

    Large files and asset-heavy development teams

  • Perforce TeamHub fits best

    Teams managing mixed repositories and artifacts

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Perforce P4 (Helix Core) 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Perforce TeamHub 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.6
Ranking #2 in Repository Management Software #6 in Repository Management Software
Best for Large files and asset-heavy development teams Teams managing mixed repositories and artifacts
Pricing model Free plan + paid Paid
Starting price $39/user/mo —
Free plan ✓ (best) —
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted, Desktop Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Windows, macOS, Linux Web
Support Email, Phone, Community, Docs Email, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, SSO/SAML SSO/SAML
Integrations 11 integrations 75+ integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Perforce P4 (Helix Core) 0/2 · Perforce TeamHub 0/2
Pull requests Not checked yet Not checked yet
Branch protection Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Hosting model Not checked yet Not checked yet
Repository visibility Not checked yet Not checked yet
Included storage Not checked yet Not checked yet
User limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Native handling for code, binary files, and other digital assets
  • File locking and granular permissions support controlled collaboration
  • Integrations include Unreal Engine, Unity, Jira, and creative tools
  • Hosts Git, Mercurial, SVN, Maven, Ivy, Docker, and WebDAV repositories
  • Code reviews include threaded comments and tasks
  • Offers cloud and on-premises deployment options
Cons
  • Centralized version control may not suit teams seeking a distributed model
  • Cloud starts at $39 per user monthly for teams up to 100 users
  • Paid self-hosted plans require a sales quote
  • No free plan; the vendor discontinued the free version in July 2025
  • Paid plan prices are quote-based
  • Build automation relies on external Jenkins rather than native CI/CD
Our verdict

Perforce P4, formerly Helix Core, is centralized version control software for source code, binary files, and other digital assets. It is aimed at development teams whose repositories include large or asset-heavy work, including game, film,…

Read the review →

Perforce TeamHub brings code hosting and collaboration together for teams working across multiple repository types. It supports Git, Mercurial, and SVN for source code, as well as Maven, Ivy, Docker, and WebDAV repositories for software…

Read the review →
  1. Perforce P4 (Helix Core)Repository Management Software 9.0Free plan
  2. Perforce TeamHubRepository Management Software 8.6Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Perforce P4 (Helix Core) — where it wins

    • Native handling for code, binary files, and other digital assets
    • File locking and granular permissions support controlled collaboration
    • Integrations include Unreal Engine, Unity, Jira, and creative tools

    Where it doesn't

    • Centralized version control may not suit teams seeking a distributed model
    • Cloud starts at $39 per user monthly for teams up to 100 users
    • Paid self-hosted plans require a sales quote
  • Perforce TeamHub — where it wins

    • Hosts Git, Mercurial, SVN, Maven, Ivy, Docker, and WebDAV repositories
    • Code reviews include threaded comments and tasks
    • Offers cloud and on-premises deployment options

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; the vendor discontinued the free version in July 2025
    • Paid plan prices are quote-based
    • Build automation relies on external Jenkins rather than native CI/CD
  • Perforce P4 (Helix Core)9.0/10 · Free plan

    A centralized repository for teams managing large files, with locking and branching tools.

    Visit PerforceFull verdict →
  • Perforce TeamHub8.6/10 · Pricing on request

    A fit for teams managing mixed repositories that need reviews, access controls, and deployment choice.

    Visit PerforceFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update