Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Functional Testing Software

OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) vs Squish

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) #4 in Functional Testing Software 9.1/10 Pricing on request Free trial✓ 0 of 5 features Visit OpenText
Squish #8 in Functional Testing Software 8.7/10 Pricing on request · 10-day trial Free trial✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Squish

OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) leads on 0 checks, Squish on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) · 9.1/10
  • Free trialboth
  • Most featuresSquish · 5 of 5

OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) scores higher on our rubric for functional testing software: 9.1 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #8.

OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) is the better fit for enterprises testing packaged and legacy applications. Squish is the better fit for teams testing desktop, web, and mobile GUIs.

  • OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) fits best

    Enterprises testing packaged and legacy applications

  • Squish fits best

    Teams testing desktop, web, and mobile GUIs

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) 9.1/10 Visit ↗ Squish 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.1 8.7
Ranking #4 in Functional Testing Software #8 in Functional Testing Software
Best for Enterprises testing packaged and legacy applications Teams testing desktop, web, and mobile GUIs
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request —
Free plan — —
Free trial 30 days 10 days
Free trial length 30 days 10 days
Deployment Self-hosted, Desktop Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms Windows, Linux Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, Android
Support Phone, Community, Docs, Tickets Email, Tickets, Docs
Integrations 6 integrations 6 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) 0/5 · Squish 5/5
Web app coverage Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Mobile app coverage Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Desktop app coverage Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Self-hosted option Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Cross-browser support Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Specs
Authoring mode Not checked yet Code
Parallel runs Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Tests web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, SAP, and packaged applications
  • AI object recognition, visual checks, and parallel execution support
  • Integrates with Git, Jenkins, Docker, and OpenText lifecycle products
  • Tests Qt, Java, Windows, web, Android, and iOS applications
  • Supports Python, JavaScript, Ruby, and Perl test scripting
  • Adds CI/CD, BDD, parallel, distributed, and embedded-device testing
Cons
  • Windows and self-hosted deployment may limit platform flexibility
  • Pricing and licensing require contact with OpenText
  • Code-based authoring requires VBScript or Python scripting
  • Commercial pricing requires contacting sales
  • No free plan is offered
  • Code-based authoring may require scripting expertise
Our verdict

OpenText Functional Testing, formerly UFT One, is an enterprise functional and end-to-end test automation product for QA teams and test engineers. Its coverage spans web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, composite, packaged, and SAP…

Read the review →

Squish is a professional GUI test automation framework from The Qt Company for QA teams testing desktop, web, mobile, embedded, and hybrid applications. Its coverage includes Qt, Java, Windows, HTML-based web applications, Android, and…

Read the review →
  1. OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One)Functional Testing Software 9.1Pricing on request
  2. SquishFunctional Testing Software 8.7Pricing on request · 10-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One) — where it wins

    • Tests web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, SAP, and packaged applications
    • AI object recognition, visual checks, and parallel execution support
    • Integrates with Git, Jenkins, Docker, and OpenText lifecycle products

    Where it doesn't

    • Windows and self-hosted deployment may limit platform flexibility
    • Pricing and licensing require contact with OpenText
    • Code-based authoring requires VBScript or Python scripting
  • Squish — where it wins

    • Tests Qt, Java, Windows, web, Android, and iOS applications
    • Supports Python, JavaScript, Ruby, and Perl test scripting
    • Adds CI/CD, BDD, parallel, distributed, and embedded-device testing

    Where it doesn't

    • Commercial pricing requires contacting sales
    • No free plan is offered
    • Code-based authoring may require scripting expertise
  • OpenText Functional Testing (formerly UFT One)9.1/10 · Pricing on request

    Broad application coverage and AI-assisted automation for Windows-focused enterprise QA.

    Visit OpenTextFull verdict →
  • Squish8.7/10 · Pricing on request · 10-day trial

    A broad GUI automation framework for teams testing complex applications across platforms.

    Visit SquishFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update