Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · GUI Testing Software

OpenText Functional Testing vs Telerik Test Studio

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 2 checks side by side
Higher score OpenText Functional Testing #6 in GUI Testing Software 8.7/10 Pricing on request · 30-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 5 features Visit OpenText
Telerik Test Studio #8 in GUI Testing Software 8.5/10 30-day trial Free trial✓ 1 of 5 features Visit Test Studio

OpenText Functional Testing leads on 0 checks, Telerik Test Studio on 0, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 2 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOpenText Functional Testing · 8.7/10
  • Free trialboth
  • Most featuresTelerik Test Studio · 1 of 5

OpenText Functional Testing scores higher on our rubric for gui testing software: 8.7 against 8.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #8.

OpenText Functional Testing is the better fit for legacy enterprise application portfolios. Telerik Test Studio is the better fit for windows teams testing web and WPF applications.

  • OpenText Functional Testing fits best

    Legacy enterprise application portfolios

  • Telerik Test Studio fits best

    Windows teams testing web and WPF applications

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OpenText Functional Testing 8.7/10 Visit ↗ Telerik Test Studio 8.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 8.5
Ranking #6 in GUI Testing Software #8 in GUI Testing Software
Best for Legacy enterprise application portfolios Windows teams testing web and WPF applications
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request · 30-day trial $2,499/device one-time
Free plan — —
Free trial 30 days 30 days
Free trial length 30 days 30 days
Deployment Self-hosted, Desktop Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms Windows, Linux Web, Windows
Support Phone, Community, Docs, Tickets Phone, Tickets, Community, Docs
Integrations 6 integrations 8 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features OpenText Functional Testing 0/5 · Telerik Test Studio 1/5
Codeless authoring Not checked yet Not checked yet
Visual validation Not checked yet Not checked yet
Cross-browser testing Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Parallel execution Not checked yet Not checked yet
Mobile app testing Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Supported targets Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Covers web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, packaged, and SAP testing
  • Supports AI recognition, reusable components, and modular test design
  • Adds parallel execution, CI/CD integrations, and Docker-based execution
  • Visual recording, playback, and code-based automation
  • Cross-browser web and WPF desktop application testing
  • Scheduling, dashboards, and CI/CD integrations
Cons
  • Pricing and licensing require contacting OpenText
  • Closed-source product with code-based test authoring
  • Modern GUI authoring capabilities are less clearly defined
  • Windows-only platform scope
  • No free plan; pricing starts at $2,499 one-time
  • Mobile testing is outside its stated test targets
Our verdict

OpenText Functional Testing, formerly UFT One, is an enterprise functional and end-to-end test automation tool for QA teams and test engineers. It supports web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, composite, packaged, and SAP applications,…

Read the review →

Telerik Test Studio is a Windows-based test automation platform for QA teams, developers, and software engineers. Its scope covers functional UI testing for web applications and WPF desktop applications, with REST API and load testing…

Read the review →
  1. OpenText Functional TestingGUI Testing Software 8.7Pricing on request · 30-day trial
  2. Telerik Test StudioGUI Testing Software 8.530-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OpenText Functional Testing — where it wins

    • Covers web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, packaged, and SAP testing
    • Supports AI recognition, reusable components, and modular test design
    • Adds parallel execution, CI/CD integrations, and Docker-based execution

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing and licensing require contacting OpenText
    • Closed-source product with code-based test authoring
    • Modern GUI authoring capabilities are less clearly defined

  • Telerik Test Studio — where it wins

    • Visual recording, playback, and code-based automation
    • Cross-browser web and WPF desktop application testing
    • Scheduling, dashboards, and CI/CD integrations

    Where it doesn't

    • Windows-only platform scope
    • No free plan; pricing starts at $2,499 one-time
    • Mobile testing is outside its stated test targets
  • OpenText Functional Testing8.7/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial

    A broad enterprise testing suite for teams managing complex, legacy application portfolios.

    Visit OpenTextFull verdict →
  • Telerik Test Studio8.5/10 · 30-day trial

    A Windows-focused automation suite with broad web, desktop, API, and CI coverage.

    Visit Test StudioFull verdict →

More comparisons

All GUI testing software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update