Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Software Testing Tools

OpenText Functional Testing vs Cypress

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 1 check side by side
Higher score OpenText Functional Testing #4 in Software Testing Tools 9.0/10 Pricing on request · 30-day trial Free trial✓ 0 of 4 features Visit OpenText
Cypress #5 in Software Testing Tools 8.9/10 Free plan · 30-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 0 of 4 features Visit Cypress

OpenText Functional Testing leads on 0 checks, Cypress on 1, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOpenText Functional Testing · 9.0/10
  • Free planonly Cypress
  • Free trialboth

OpenText Functional Testing scores higher on our rubric for software testing tools: 9.0 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #5.

Cypress offers free plan; OpenText Functional Testing doesn't.

OpenText Functional Testing is the better fit for enterprise multi-technology functional testing. Cypress is the better fit for javaScript web and component testing.

  • OpenText Functional Testing fits best

    Enterprise multi-technology functional testing

  • Cypress fits best

    JavaScript web and component testing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OpenText Functional Testing 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Cypress 8.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 8.9
Ranking #4 in Software Testing Tools #5 in Software Testing Tools
Best for Enterprise multi-technology functional testing JavaScript web and component testing
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Pricing on request · 30-day trial $799/yr
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial 30 days 30 days
Free trial length 30 days 30 days
Deployment Self-hosted, Desktop Cloud, Desktop
Platforms Windows, Linux Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Phone, Community, Docs, Tickets Email, Community, Docs
Integrations 6 integrations 6 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features OpenText Functional Testing 0/4 · Cypress 0/4
API testing Not checked yet Not checked yet
Performance testing Not checked yet Not checked yet
Mobile testing Not checked yet Not checked yet
Test management Not checked yet Not checked yet
Specs
Deployment model Not checked yet Not checked yet
Parallel runs Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • AI object detection and computer-vision-based object identification
  • Parallel and distributed execution, including Docker-based web and API runs
  • Tests web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, composite, and packaged applications
  • End-to-end and component tests in JavaScript or TypeScript
  • Cross-browser execution across Chrome-family, Firefox, and WebKit
  • Cloud recording, replay, analytics, parallelization, and CI support
Cons
  • Pricing is handled through sales rather than published plans
  • No free plan is offered
  • Deployment is centered on self-hosted and desktop environments
  • Paid plans use annual billing
  • Visual comparison relies on plugins or integrations
  • Primarily suited to JavaScript and TypeScript test authoring
Our verdict

OpenText Functional Testing is an automated functional and end-to-end testing tool for QA and development teams working across complex enterprise environments. It covers web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, composite, SAP, and packaged…

Read the review →

Cypress is a quality platform for teams building modern web applications, with an open-source desktop app for local and CI end-to-end and component testing. Tests are authored primarily in JavaScript or TypeScript and run in real browsers,…

Read the review →
  1. OpenText Functional TestingSoftware Testing Tools 9.0Pricing on request · 30-day trial
  2. CypressSoftware Testing Tools 8.9Free plan · 30-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OpenText Functional Testing — where it wins

    • AI object detection and computer-vision-based object identification
    • Parallel and distributed execution, including Docker-based web and API runs
    • Tests web, desktop, mobile, API, mainframe, composite, and packaged applications

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is handled through sales rather than published plans
    • No free plan is offered
    • Deployment is centered on self-hosted and desktop environments
  • Cypress — where it wins

    • End-to-end and component tests in JavaScript or TypeScript
    • Cross-browser execution across Chrome-family, Firefox, and WebKit
    • Cloud recording, replay, analytics, parallelization, and CI support

    Where it doesn't

    • Paid plans use annual billing
    • Visual comparison relies on plugins or integrations
    • Primarily suited to JavaScript and TypeScript test authoring
  • OpenText Functional Testing9.0/10 · Pricing on request · 30-day trial

    A broad, enterprise-focused testing suite for complex multi-technology application estates.

    Visit OpenTextFull verdict →
  • Cypress8.9/10 · Free plan · 30-day trial

    A JavaScript-first testing platform with strong browser coverage, CI workflows, and cloud analytics.

    Visit CypressFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update