Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · DevSecOps Platforms

OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform vs GitHub Advanced Security

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 7 checks side by side
Higher score OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform #5 in DevSecOps Platforms 8.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 6 of 6 features Visit site
GitHub Advanced Security #6 in DevSecOps Platforms 8.7/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 6 features Visit GitHub

OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform leads on 0 checks, GitHub Advanced Security on 0, and 7 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 7 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOpenText Fortify Software Security Platform · 8.8/10
  • Free planonly GitHub Advanced Security
  • Most featuresOpenText Fortify Software Security Platform · 6 of 6

OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform scores higher on our rubric for devsecops platforms: 8.8 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #5 and #6.

OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform is the better fit for mature teams combining SAST and DAST. GitHub Advanced Security is the better fit for gitHub-centered development organizations.

  • OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform fits best

    Mature teams combining SAST and DAST

  • GitHub Advanced Security fits best

    GitHub-centered development organizations

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform 8.8/10 Visit ↗ GitHub Advanced Security 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 8.7
Ranking #5 in DevSecOps Platforms #6 in DevSecOps Platforms
Best for Mature teams combining SAST and DAST GitHub-centered development organizations
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Pricing on request $19/user/mo
Free plan Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web
Support Docs · 24/7 Email, Phone, Tickets, Community, Docs
Compliance ISO 27001, PCI DSS SOC 2, SSO/SAML, 2FA
Integrations 9 integrations 3 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform 6/6 · GitHub Advanced Security 3/6
IaC scanning ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Container scanning ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Policy as code ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Remediation workflows ✓ ✓
SBOM management ✓ ✓
Compliance reporting ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment model Hybrid Hybrid
Our review
Pros
  • Combines SAST, DAST, SCA, IaC, container, and Kubernetes scanning
  • Connects with major IDEs, CI/CD systems, and Jira
  • Adds policy enforcement, remediation reporting, and AI guidance
  • CodeQL scanning, third-party SARIF uploads, and Copilot Autofix
  • Secret scanning, push protection, and dependency security
  • Security campaigns, SBOM export, audit logs, and compliance reports
Cons
  • Pricing is sales-led rather than published by plan
  • Its broad scope may exceed teams seeking a single focused scanner
  • It is proprietary rather than open source
  • Paid licensing applies to private and enterprise repositories
  • Strongest fit requires development workflows centered on GitHub
  • Capabilities are divided across two separately priced plans
Our verdict

OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform is a hybrid application security platform for enterprise development, security, and compliance teams. It brings together static application security testing, dynamic application security testing,…

Read the review →

GitHub Advanced Security is GitHub’s application-security offering for development teams and organizations. It combines GitHub Secret Protection and GitHub Code Security within GitHub workflows, covering code scanning, secret detection,…

Read the review →
  1. OpenText Fortify Software Security PlatformDevSecOps Platforms 8.8Pricing on request
  2. GitHub Advanced SecurityDevSecOps Platforms 8.7Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform — where it wins

    • Combines SAST, DAST, SCA, IaC, container, and Kubernetes scanning
    • Connects with major IDEs, CI/CD systems, and Jira
    • Adds policy enforcement, remediation reporting, and AI guidance

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is sales-led rather than published by plan
    • Its broad scope may exceed teams seeking a single focused scanner
    • It is proprietary rather than open source
  • GitHub Advanced Security — where it wins

    • CodeQL scanning, third-party SARIF uploads, and Copilot Autofix
    • Secret scanning, push protection, and dependency security
    • Security campaigns, SBOM export, audit logs, and compliance reports

    Where it doesn't

    • Paid licensing applies to private and enterprise repositories
    • Strongest fit requires development workflows centered on GitHub
    • Capabilities are divided across two separately priced plans
  • OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform8.8/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad Fortify platform for mature teams combining SAST and DAST.

    Visit siteFull verdict →
  • GitHub Advanced Security8.7/10 · Free plan

    A GitHub-native DevSecOps suite covering code, secrets, dependencies, and remediation.

    Visit GitHubFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update