Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Application Security Testing

OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform vs CodeSonar

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
Higher score OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform #1 in Application Security Testing 9.0/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 2 features Visit OpenText
CodeSonar #7 in Application Security Testing 6.8/10 Pricing on request ✓ 0 of 2 features Visit AdaCore

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOpenText Fortify Software Security Platform · 9.0/10

OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform scores higher on our rubric for application security testing: 9.0 against 6.8 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #7.

OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform is the better fit for enterprises seeking a broad AppSec suite. CodeSonar is the better fit for safety-critical teams needing deep static analysis.

  • OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform fits best

    Enterprises seeking a broad AppSec suite

  • CodeSonar fits best

    Safety-critical teams needing deep static analysis

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform 9.0/10 Visit ↗ CodeSonar 6.8/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 6.8
Ranking #1 in Application Security Testing #7 in Application Security Testing
Best for Enterprises seeking a broad AppSec suite Safety-critical teams needing deep static analysis
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan Not published Not published
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted, Cloud
Platforms Web Windows, Linux, Web
Support Docs · 24/7 Docs
Integrations 9 integrations 9 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform 0/2 · CodeSonar 0/2
SCA included Not published Not published
API testing Not published Not published
Specs
Testing methods Not published Not published
Languages supported Not published Not published
CI/CD integrations Not published Not published
Deployment options Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Covers SAST, DAST, SCA, IaC, container, and Kubernetes scanning
  • Integrates with IDEs, CI/CD systems, and Jira
  • Centralizes vulnerability tracking, remediation reporting, and policy enforcement
  • Analyzes execution paths with abstract interpretation and symbolic execution
  • Tracks tainted data and detects memory defects across whole programs
  • Supports coding standards and compiled-binary, mixed-language analysis
Cons
  • Pricing is sales-led rather than presented as public plans
  • The product is not open source
  • Its broad capability set may not suit teams seeking a single-purpose scanner
  • Focused on static analysis rather than a broad range of AppSec testing types
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Documentation is the listed support channel
Our verdict

OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform brings application security testing and vulnerability management together for development, security, and compliance teams. Its coverage spans static and dynamic testing, open-source dependency…

Read the review →

CodeSonar is a static analysis and application security testing tool for C/C++ and other languages. AdaCore positions it for enterprise, embedded, safety-critical, and high-integrity software projects. Its whole-program analysis uses…

Read the review →
  1. OpenText Fortify Software Security PlatformApplication Security Testing 9.0Pricing on request
  2. CodeSonarApplication Security Testing 6.8Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform — where it wins

    • Covers SAST, DAST, SCA, IaC, container, and Kubernetes scanning
    • Integrates with IDEs, CI/CD systems, and Jira
    • Centralizes vulnerability tracking, remediation reporting, and policy enforcement

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is sales-led rather than presented as public plans
    • The product is not open source
    • Its broad capability set may not suit teams seeking a single-purpose scanner
  • CodeSonar — where it wins

    • Analyzes execution paths with abstract interpretation and symbolic execution
    • Tracks tainted data and detects memory defects across whole programs
    • Supports coding standards and compiled-binary, mixed-language analysis

    Where it doesn't

    • Focused on static analysis rather than a broad range of AppSec testing types
    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • Documentation is the listed support channel
  • OpenText Fortify Software Security Platform9.0/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad AppSec suite for teams centralizing testing, tracking, and remediation.

    Visit OpenTextFull verdict →
  • CodeSonar6.8/10 · Pricing on request

    Whole-program static analysis for teams prioritizing code defects, vulnerabilities, and standards checks.

    Visit AdaCoreFull verdict →

More comparisons

Guides on application security testing

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update