Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

Head-to-head · AI Clinical Decision Support Software

OpenEvidence vs ClinIQ

  • Updated Nov 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score OpenEvidence #4 in AI Clinical Decision Support Software 8.6/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 6 features Visit OpenEvidence
ClinIQ #8 in AI Clinical Decision Support Software 7.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 6 features Visit ClinIQ

OpenEvidence leads on 0 checks, ClinIQ on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOpenEvidence · 8.6/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresClinIQ · 5 of 6

OpenEvidence scores higher on our rubric for ai clinical decision support software: 8.6 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #8.

OpenEvidence is the better fit for clinicians seeking free, cited mobile clinical answers. ClinIQ is the better fit for solo clinicians wanting scores and structured case support.

  • OpenEvidence fits best

    Clinicians seeking free, cited mobile clinical answers

  • ClinIQ fits best

    Solo clinicians wanting scores and structured case support

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OpenEvidence 8.6/10 Visit ↗ ClinIQ 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.6 7.9
Ranking #4 in AI Clinical Decision Support Software #8 in AI Clinical Decision Support Software
Best for Clinicians seeking free, cited mobile clinical answers Solo clinicians wanting scores and structured case support
Pricing model Free Free plan + paid
Starting price Free $199/yr
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Mobile Cloud
Platforms iOS, Android Web
Compliance SOC 2, HIPAA GDPR, HIPAA
Built for Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Solo, Small business
Features OpenEvidence 0/6 · ClinIQ 5/6
Differential diagnosis Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Treatment recommendations Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Drug interaction support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Clinical risk prediction Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Evidence citations Not checked yet ✓ (best)
EHR integration Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Our review
Pros
  • Answers cite claims to peer-reviewed and other medical sources.
  • EvidenceGrade indicators show the strength of supporting evidence.
  • Mobile apps include Voice Mode, CME and MOC features.
  • 46 clinical scores across six medical specialties
  • Differential diagnoses include probabilities, rationales, and missing findings
  • Case workflow spans history, orders, results, and discharge summaries
Cons
  • Access is limited to verified healthcare professionals.
  • Mobile deployment may not fit teams seeking desktop access.
  • No verified EHR integrations are described.
  • Available as a web product with cloud deployment
  • EHR/HIS support is described as copyable discharge summaries
  • Free physician access limits are not specified
Our verdict

OpenEvidence is a clinical decision-support and medical search platform for verified healthcare professionals. It answers clinical questions using peer-reviewed medical literature, medical journals, FDA and CDC sources, and licensed…

Read the review →

ClinIQ is an AI clinical decision support system for physicians, with a case workflow that follows patient history through diagnostic orders, results, and discharge summaries. It is aimed at clinicians who want structured support alongside…

Read the review →
  1. OpenEvidenceAI Clinical Decision Support Software 8.6Free plan
  2. ClinIQAI Clinical Decision Support Software 7.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OpenEvidence — where it wins

    • Answers cite claims to peer-reviewed and other medical sources.
    • EvidenceGrade indicators show the strength of supporting evidence.
    • Mobile apps include Voice Mode, CME and MOC features.

    Where it doesn't

    • Access is limited to verified healthcare professionals.
    • Mobile deployment may not fit teams seeking desktop access.
    • No verified EHR integrations are described.
  • ClinIQ — where it wins

    • 46 clinical scores across six medical specialties
    • Differential diagnoses include probabilities, rationales, and missing findings
    • Case workflow spans history, orders, results, and discharge summaries

    Where it doesn't

    • Available as a web product with cloud deployment
    • EHR/HIS support is described as copyable discharge summaries
    • Free physician access limits are not specified

OpenEvidence vs ClinIQ: questions

Which is better for AI clinical decision support software, OpenEvidence or ClinIQ?

OpenEvidence scores higher on our rubric for ai clinical decision support software: 8.6 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #4 and #8.

How do OpenEvidence and ClinIQ compare?

All 6 checks we put side by side come out level: neither leads on any.

Do OpenEvidence and ClinIQ have a free plan?

OpenEvidence: Yes. ClinIQ: Yes.

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Nov 2026

Last updated · How we research and update