Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Site Reliability Engineering Platforms

OneUptime vs Pyrra

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side
Higher score OneUptime #6 in Site Reliability Engineering Platforms 7.8/10 Free plan · paid from $22/user/mo · 14-day trial Free plan✓ 0 of 5 features Visit OneUptime
Pyrra #7 in Site Reliability Engineering Platforms 7.5/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 3 of 5 features Visit Pyrra

OneUptime leads on 0 checks, Pyrra on 3, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreOneUptime · 7.8/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresPyrra · 3 of 5

OneUptime scores higher on our rubric for site reliability engineering platforms: 7.8 against 7.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #6 and #7.

Pyrra offers slo management; OneUptime doesn't publish it. Pyrra offers error-budget tracking; OneUptime doesn't publish it. Pyrra offers sre reporting; OneUptime doesn't publish it.

OneUptime is the better fit for smaller teams combining on-call and incident response. Pyrra is the better fit for prometheus teams wanting open-source SLO dashboards.

  • OneUptime fits best

    Smaller teams combining on-call and incident response

  • Pyrra fits best

    Prometheus teams wanting open-source SLO dashboards

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature OneUptime 7.8/10 Visit ↗ Pyrra 7.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.8 7.5
Ranking #6 in Site Reliability Engineering Platforms #7 in Site Reliability Engineering Platforms
Best for Smaller teams combining on-call and incident response Prometheus teams wanting open-source SLO dashboards
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price $22/user/mo Not published
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web Web, Linux
Support Email, Live chat, Phone, Docs · 24/7 Community, Docs
Integrations 5,000+ integrations 4 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features OneUptime 0/5 · Pyrra 3/5
SLO management Not published ✓ (best)
Error-budget tracking Not published ✓ (best)
Reliability scorecards Not published Not published
Workflow automation Not published Not published
SRE reporting Not published ✓ (best)
Specs
Service limit Not published Not published
Deployment model Not published Hybrid
Our review
Pros
  • Connects incident management with on-call rotations and alert escalation
  • Attaches runbooks and publishes incident updates or postmortems to status pages
  • Offers hosted and self-hosted deployment options
  • Defines SLOs in Kubernetes resources or YAML files
  • Generates burn-rate recording rules and multi-window alerts
  • Shows error budgets and historical trends in Grafana dashboards
Cons
  • Published features do not show SLO or error-budget management
  • Growth starts at $22 per user monthly; Scale is $99 per user monthly
  • The Free plan limits status pages to one and subscribers to 100
  • Runs alongside a metrics backend rather than replacing one
  • Requires teams to operate Kubernetes, Docker, or filesystem configuration
  • Support is through community channels and documentation
Our verdict

OneUptime combines incident management, on-call response and observability for teams operating software and infrastructure. It supports manual or monitor-triggered incident creation, custom states and severity levels, owner assignment,…

Read the review →

For teams managing services with Prometheus-compatible metrics, Pyrra provides an open-source way to define and track service-level objectives. SLOs can be declared in Kubernetes resources or YAML files; Pyrra then generates Prometheus…

Read the review →
  1. OneUptimeSite Reliability Engineering Platforms 7.8Free plan · paid from $22/user/mo · 14-day trial
  2. PyrraSite Reliability Engineering Platforms 7.5Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • OneUptime — where it wins

    • Connects incident management with on-call rotations and alert escalation
    • Attaches runbooks and publishes incident updates or postmortems to status pages
    • Offers hosted and self-hosted deployment options

    Where it doesn't

    • Published features do not show SLO or error-budget management
    • Growth starts at $22 per user monthly; Scale is $99 per user monthly
    • The Free plan limits status pages to one and subscribers to 100

  • Pyrra — where it wins

    • Defines SLOs in Kubernetes resources or YAML files
    • Generates burn-rate recording rules and multi-window alerts
    • Shows error budgets and historical trends in Grafana dashboards

    Where it doesn't

    • Runs alongside a metrics backend rather than replacing one
    • Requires teams to operate Kubernetes, Docker, or filesystem configuration
    • Support is through community channels and documentation
  • OneUptime7.8/10 · Free plan · paid from $22/user/mo · 14-day trial

    OneUptime brings incident workflows and on-call response together, with observability tools alongside.

    Visit OneUptimeFull verdict →
  • Pyrra7.5/10 · Free plan

    A focused, open-source SLO tool for teams already running Prometheus-compatible metrics.

    Visit PyrraFull verdict →

More comparisons

All site reliability engineering platforms comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update