Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Virtual Routers Software

Nokia Virtualized Service Router vs MikroTik Cloud Hosted Router (CHR)

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score Nokia Virtualized Service Router #3 in Virtual Routers Software 7.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 2 of 2 features Visit Nokia
MikroTik Cloud Hosted Router (CHR) #5 in Virtual Routers Software 7.0/10 Free plan · paid from $45 · 60-day trial Free plan✓ 2 of 2 features Visit MikroTik CHR

Nokia Virtualized Service Router leads on 0 checks, MikroTik Cloud Hosted Router (CHR) on 1, and 2 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreNokia Virtualized Service Router · 7.7/10
  • Free planonly MikroTik Cloud Hosted Router (CHR)

Nokia Virtualized Service Router scores higher on our rubric for virtual routers software: 7.7 against 7.0 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #5.

MikroTik Cloud Hosted Router (CHR) offers free plan; Nokia Virtualized Service Router doesn't publish it.

Nokia Virtualized Service Router is the better fit for operators needing virtualized service-provider functions. MikroTik Cloud Hosted Router (CHR) is the better fit for budget-conscious teams wanting a feature-rich virtual router.

  • Nokia Virtualized Service Router fits best

    Operators needing virtualized service-provider functions

  • MikroTik Cloud Hosted Router (CHR) fits best

    Budget-conscious teams wanting a feature-rich virtual router

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Nokia Virtualized Service Router 7.7/10 Visit ↗ MikroTik Cloud Hosted Router (CHR) 7.0/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.7 7.0
Ranking #3 in Virtual Routers Software #5 in Virtual Routers Software
Best for Operators needing virtualized service-provider functions Budget-conscious teams wanting a feature-rich virtual router
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan Not published ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Linux Linux, Windows, macOS
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Nokia Virtualized Service Router 2/2 · MikroTik Cloud Hosted Router (CHR) 2/2
VPN support ✓ ✓
High availability ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment type Not published Virtual machine
Routing protocols BGP, OSPF, IS-IS, RIP RIP v1/v2, OSPFv2, BGP v4, RIPng, OSPFv3, BGP, BFD
Max throughput Not published 1000 Mbps
Cloud platforms Not published AWS, Hetzner Cloud, Linode, Google Compute Engine, Vultr
Our review
Pros
  • Supports IP/MPLS edge services across business, residential and mobile networks.
  • Combines BNG, L2TP, residential gateway, NAT and IPsec functions.
  • Offers VM or container deployment with multi-node resiliency options.
  • Supports static, VRF, policy-based, ECMP and dynamic routing
  • Includes IPsec, WireGuard, OpenVPN and other tunnel protocols
  • Runs on major hypervisors and documented cloud environments
Cons
  • Pricing is handled through contact sales.
  • Scaling depends on adding CPU and memory resources.
  • Its focus on service-provider functions may not suit simpler routing needs.
  • Free tier limits upload to 1 Mbps per interface
  • Deployment requires importing or launching a virtual machine image
  • Throughput depends on the selected speed tier and license
Our verdict

Nokia Virtualized Service Router is IP edge routing software based on Nokia’s Service Router Operating System. It is aimed at service providers, cloud providers and mission-critical enterprise environments that need virtualized network…

Read the review →

MikroTik Cloud Hosted Router (CHR) is a virtualized edition of RouterOS for x86-64 virtual machines. It brings routing, firewall, VPN and network-management capabilities to local or cloud deployments, with images for common hypervisors and…

Read the review →
  1. Nokia Virtualized Service RouterVirtual Routers Software 7.7Pricing on request
  2. MikroTik Cloud Hosted Router (CHR)Virtual Routers Software 7.0Free plan · paid from $45 · 60-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Nokia Virtualized Service Router — where it wins

    • Supports IP/MPLS edge services across business, residential and mobile networks.
    • Combines BNG, L2TP, residential gateway, NAT and IPsec functions.
    • Offers VM or container deployment with multi-node resiliency options.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing is handled through contact sales.
    • Scaling depends on adding CPU and memory resources.
    • Its focus on service-provider functions may not suit simpler routing needs.
  • MikroTik Cloud Hosted Router (CHR) — where it wins

    • Supports static, VRF, policy-based, ECMP and dynamic routing
    • Includes IPsec, WireGuard, OpenVPN and other tunnel protocols
    • Runs on major hypervisors and documented cloud environments

    Where it doesn't

    • Free tier limits upload to 1 Mbps per interface
    • Deployment requires importing or launching a virtual machine image
    • Throughput depends on the selected speed tier and license
  • Nokia Virtualized Service Router7.7/10 · Pricing on request

    A service-provider-focused virtual router spanning IP/MPLS, broadband, NAT and IPsec functions.

    Visit NokiaFull verdict →
  • MikroTik Cloud Hosted Router (CHR)7.0/10 · Free plan · paid from $45 · 60-day trial

    A perpetual-license virtual RouterOS with extensive routing, VPN, firewall and cloud options.

    Visit MikroTik CHRFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update