NGINX vs Skipper

NGINX9.3Visit Skipper7.9Visit

Higher score NGINX #1 in Reverse Proxy Software 9.3/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 4 of 5 features Visit NGINX

vs

Skipper #10 in Reverse Proxy Software 7.9/10 Open source ✓ 4 of 5 features Visit Skipper

• NGINX fits best

  Established general-purpose reverse proxying

• Skipper fits best

  Kubernetes routing with advanced controls

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature	NGINX 9.3/10 Visit ↗	Skipper 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score	9.3	7.9
Ranking	#1 in Reverse Proxy Software	#10 in Reverse Proxy Software
Best for	Established general-purpose reverse proxying	Kubernetes routing with advanced controls
Pricing model	Free	Free
Starting price	Free plan	Open source
Free plan	✓ (best)	Not checked yet
Free trial	—	—
Deployment	Self-hosted	Self-hosted
Platforms	Linux, Windows	Linux, Windows, macOS
Support	Community, Docs	Docs, Community
Built for	Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise	Mid-market, Enterprise
Features NGINX 4/5 · Skipper 4/5
TLS termination	✓	✓
Web application firewall	—	Not checked yet
Response caching	✓	✓
WebSocket support	✓	✓
Rate limiting	✓	✓
Specs
Deployment model	Self-hosted	Self-hosted
Configuration method	File	Both
Our review
Pros	Free open-source deployment on Linux and Windows Supports HTTP, TCP, and UDP proxying and load balancing Includes caching, TLS termination, WebSockets, and rate limiting	Predicate-based routing across paths, methods, hosts, headers and cookies Cluster-wide rate limiting, caching, mTLS and circuit breakers Runs standalone or as a Kubernetes Ingress controller
Cons	Self-hosted deployment requires infrastructure administration Configuration is managed through text files Web application firewall protection is not included	Self-hosted deployment requires infrastructure ownership WebSocket support is documented as experimental Its extensive controls may exceed simpler routing needs
Our verdict	NGINX is open-source infrastructure software for serving web content, reverse proxying applications, caching responses, and balancing or proxying HTTP, TCP, and UDP traffic. It is designed for teams managing their own infrastructure on… Read the review →	Skipper is an open-source HTTP router and reverse proxy for service composition. It is designed for infrastructure teams operating self-hosted proxy and ingress deployments, either as a standalone proxy or as a Kubernetes Ingress… Read the review →

Strengths and trade-offs

• NGINX — where it wins

  • Free open-source deployment on Linux and Windows
  • Supports HTTP, TCP, and UDP proxying and load balancing
  • Includes caching, TLS termination, WebSockets, and rate limiting

  Where it doesn't

  • Self-hosted deployment requires infrastructure administration
  • Configuration is managed through text files
  • Web application firewall protection is not included

• Skipper — where it wins

  • Predicate-based routing across paths, methods, hosts, headers and cookies
  • Cluster-wide rate limiting, caching, mTLS and circuit breakers
  • Runs standalone or as a Kubernetes Ingress controller

  Where it doesn't

  • Self-hosted deployment requires infrastructure ownership
  • WebSocket support is documented as experimental
  • Its extensive controls may exceed simpler routing needs

• NGINX9.3/10 · Free plan

  A flexible self-hosted reverse proxy with caching, load balancing, TLS, and protocol support.

  Visit NGINXFull verdict →
• Skipper7.9/10 · Open source

  A self-hosted Kubernetes ingress and reverse proxy with advanced traffic controls.

  Visit SkipperFull verdict →