Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Kubernetes Ingress Controllers

NGINX Ingress Controller vs Apache APISIX

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score NGINX Ingress Controller #2 in Kubernetes Ingress Controllers 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit NGINX
Apache APISIX #7 in Kubernetes Ingress Controllers 8.7/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 0 of 5 features Visit Apache APISIX

NGINX Ingress Controller leads on 0 checks, Apache APISIX on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreNGINX Ingress Controller · 9.2/10
  • Free planboth
  • Most featuresNGINX Ingress Controller · 5 of 5

NGINX Ingress Controller scores higher on our rubric for kubernetes ingress controllers: 9.2 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #7.

NGINX Ingress Controller is the better fit for organizations standardizing on NGINX ingress. Apache APISIX is the better fit for open-source API gateway and ingress teams.

  • NGINX Ingress Controller fits best

    Organizations standardizing on NGINX ingress

  • Apache APISIX fits best

    Open-source API gateway and ingress teams

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature NGINX Ingress Controller 9.2/10 Visit ↗ Apache APISIX 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.7
Ranking #2 in Kubernetes Ingress Controllers #7 in Kubernetes Ingress Controllers
Best for Organizations standardizing on NGINX ingress Open-source API gateway and ingress teams
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price Free plan Free plan
Free plan ✓ ✓
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted
Support Community, Docs Community, Docs
Integrations 5 integrations 5 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features NGINX Ingress Controller 5/5 · Apache APISIX 0/5
TLS automation ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Canary routing ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Rate limiting ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Web application firewall ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Auth policies ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Ingress API model Ingress Not checked yet
Deployment model Self-hosted Self-hosted
Our review
Pros
  • Free open-source controller for self-hosted Kubernetes deployments
  • Supports routing, TLS, canary, blue-green, rate limiting, and auth policies
  • Integrates with NGINX Plus, F5 WAF for NGINX, cert-manager, and Prometheus
  • Kubernetes Ingress and Gateway API integration
  • 100+ gateway and AI plugins plus a built-in Dashboard UI
  • Supports HTTP, gRPC, MQTT, WebSocket, TCP, UDP, and HTTP/3
Cons
  • Requires a Kubernetes environment and operator-managed deployment
  • NGINX Plus commercial features require a subscription
  • Its verified ingress API model is centered on Ingress
  • Self-hosted deployment requires infrastructure ownership
  • Broad capabilities can increase configuration and governance effort
  • Not designed for teams seeking a fully managed ingress service
Our verdict

NGINX Ingress Controller is a Kubernetes controller for NGINX and NGINX Plus, designed for platform teams and operators managing application traffic at the cluster edge. It runs inside a Kubernetes cluster and routes HTTP applications…

Read the review →

Apache APISIX is an open-source API and AI gateway for teams operating Kubernetes environments, APIs, microservices, and multi-protocol traffic. It combines dynamic routing, load balancing, authentication, configurable rate limiting,…

Read the review →
  1. NGINX Ingress ControllerKubernetes Ingress Controllers 9.2Free plan
  2. Apache APISIXKubernetes Ingress Controllers 8.7Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • NGINX Ingress Controller — where it wins

    • Free open-source controller for self-hosted Kubernetes deployments
    • Supports routing, TLS, canary, blue-green, rate limiting, and auth policies
    • Integrates with NGINX Plus, F5 WAF for NGINX, cert-manager, and Prometheus

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires a Kubernetes environment and operator-managed deployment
    • NGINX Plus commercial features require a subscription
    • Its verified ingress API model is centered on Ingress
  • Apache APISIX — where it wins

    • Kubernetes Ingress and Gateway API integration
    • 100+ gateway and AI plugins plus a built-in Dashboard UI
    • Supports HTTP, gRPC, MQTT, WebSocket, TCP, UDP, and HTTP/3

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires infrastructure ownership
    • Broad capabilities can increase configuration and governance effort
    • Not designed for teams seeking a fully managed ingress service
  • NGINX Ingress Controller9.2/10 · Free plan

    A free, self-hosted controller for routing, TLS, traffic policies, and edge integrations.

    Visit NGINXFull verdict →
  • Apache APISIX8.7/10 · Free plan

    A self-hosted Kubernetes gateway with broad protocol support and an extensive plugin ecosystem.

    Visit Apache APISIXFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update