Head-to-head · Knowledge Graph Software
Neo4j vs Apache Jena Fuseki
Neo4j leads on 0 checks, Apache Jena Fuseki on 0, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreNeo4j · 9.3/10
- Free planonly Neo4j
- Free trialonly Neo4j
Neo4j scores higher on our rubric for knowledge graph software: 9.3 against 8.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #4.
Neo4j is the better fit for property-graph applications with strong developer tooling. Apache Jena Fuseki is the better fit for open-source teams building self-hosted RDF services.
- Neo4j fits best
Property-graph applications with strong developer tooling
- Apache Jena Fuseki fits best
Open-source teams building self-hosted RDF services
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Neo4j 9.3/10 Visit ↗ | Apache Jena Fuseki 8.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.3 | 8.9 |
| Ranking | #1 in Knowledge Graph Software | #4 in Knowledge Graph Software |
| Best for | Property-graph applications with strong developer tooling | Open-source teams building self-hosted RDF services |
| Pricing model | Free plan + paid | Free |
| Starting price | — | Open source |
| Free plan | ✓ (best) | Not checked yet |
| Free trial | 14 days | — |
| Deployment | Cloud, Self-hosted | Self-hosted |
| Platforms | Web, Windows, macOS, Linux | Windows, Linux |
| Support | Tickets, Live chat, Community, Docs | Community, Docs |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Neo4j 0/4 · Apache Jena Fuseki 0/4 | ||
| Ontology modeling | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Semantic reasoning | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| RDF/SPARQL support | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Graph visualization | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Specs | ||
| Import formats | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Deployment | Not checked yet | Not checked yet |
| Query languages | Cypher, GQL | Not checked yet |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Neo4j is a native property graph database for developers, data scientists, and organizations working with connected data. It stores nodes, relationships, and properties, then exposes them through the Cypher declarative query language.… Read the review → |
Apache Jena Fuseki is an open-source SPARQL server for publishing, querying, and updating RDF datasets over HTTP. It is aimed at teams building self-hosted RDF services that need standards-based query and update protocols, persistent or… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Neo4j — where it wins
- Native nodes, relationships, properties, and Cypher queries
- ACID transactions, clustering, failover, and horizontal scaling
- Graph algorithms, vector search, connectors, and official libraries
Where it doesn't
- Professional starts at $65 per GB per month
- Business Critical requires a minimum 2GB cluster
- Native property-graph focus may not suit RDF-first projects
Apache Jena Fuseki — where it wins
- Supports SPARQL 1.1, RDF-star, federation, and multiple inference options
- Offers standalone, service, web application, embedded, and Docker deployment
- Includes dataset, endpoint, graph, and server access control
Where it doesn't
- Requires a self-hosted deployment model
- Platform coverage centers on Windows, Linux, and API access
- Configuration is needed for storage, inference, and access control
- Neo4j9.3/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial
A developer-focused property graph with broad tooling, cloud options, and AI-ready search.
Visit Neo4jFull verdict → - Apache Jena Fuseki8.9/10 · Open source
An open-source RDF server with strong SPARQL, inference, federation, and deployment options.
Visit FusekiFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Neo4j vs Protégé
- Neo4j vs Progress Semaphore
- Neo4j vs Stardog
- Neo4j vs AllegroGraph
- Neo4j vs PoolParty Semantic Suite
- Neo4j vs OpenLink Virtuoso
- Protégé vs Apache Jena Fuseki
- Progress Semaphore vs Apache Jena Fuseki
All knowledge graph software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





