Head-to-head · Code Complexity Analyzers
NDepend vs Qlty Cloud
NDepend leads on 0 checks, Qlty Cloud on 1, and 0 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 1 yes/no, price and count check where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Free planonly Qlty Cloud
NDepend and Qlty Cloud score identically on our rubric (6.9 out of 10) for code complexity analyzers; NDepend sits at #5 and Qlty Cloud at #6 in our editorial ranking, so the choice comes down to fit.
Qlty Cloud offers free plan; NDepend doesn't.
NDepend is the better fit for .NET teams needing metrics and quality gates. Qlty Cloud is the better fit for teams wanting cloud PR analysis and autofix.
- NDepend fits best
.NET teams needing metrics and quality gates
- Qlty Cloud fits best
Teams wanting cloud PR analysis and autofix
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | NDepend 6.9/10 Visit ↗ | Qlty Cloud 6.9/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 6.9 | 6.9 |
| Ranking | #5 in Code Complexity Analyzers | #6 in Code Complexity Analyzers |
| Best for | .NET teams needing metrics and quality gates | Teams wanting cloud PR analysis and autofix |
| Pricing model | Paid | Free plan + paid |
| Starting price | Not published | Not published |
| Free plan | — | ✓ (best) |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Desktop, Cloud | Cloud, Browser extension |
| Platforms | Windows, macOS, Linux | Web, Chrome extension |
| Support | Email, Docs | Email, Community |
| Integrations | 10 integrations | 9 integrations |
| Built for | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features NDepend 0/4 · Qlty Cloud 0/4 | ||
| Hotspot detection | Not published | Not published |
| IDE feedback | Not published | Not published |
| Pull-request gates | Not published | Not published |
| Trend history | Not published | Not published |
| Specs | ||
| Complexity metrics | Not published | Not published |
| Supported languages | Not published | Not published |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | NDepend analyzes .NET applications and assemblies for developers, architects, and engineering teams that need to understand code complexity and dependencies. It reports metrics such as lines of code, coupling, and nesting depth; maps… Read the review → |
Qlty Cloud analyzes code health in pull requests, covering complexity, maintainability, duplication, coverage impact, and security findings. It is aimed at development teams that want cloud-based review and configurable quality gates… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
NDepend — where it wins
- Measures complexity, coupling, nesting depth, and lines of code
- Custom CQLinq rules and quality gates can fail builds
- Tracks trends and debt estimates, with CI and IDE integrations
Where it doesn't
- Supports .NET languages rather than a broad range of languages
- Developer edition is Windows-only
- Paid product; no free plan
Qlty Cloud — where it wins
- Analyzes complexity, maintainability, and duplication in pull requests
- Free plan includes coverage, linting, and unlimited contributors
- AI autofix suggestions and configurable quality gates
Where it doesn't
- Pro starts at $20 per contributor per month
- Advanced analytics and organization policies require Enterprise
- Annual plan dollar amounts are not shown
- NDepend6.9/10 · 14-day trial
A .NET-focused analyzer that pairs code metrics with customizable rules and build gates.
Visit NDependFull verdict → - Qlty Cloud6.9/10 · Free plan · paid from $20/mo
Qlty Cloud combines complexity analysis with PR review, quality gates, security scans, and AI autofix.
Visit Qlty CloudFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Qodana vs NDepend
- CodeScene vs NDepend
- CodeScene vs Qlty Cloud
- Codacy vs NDepend
- Codacy vs Qlty Cloud
- PMD vs NDepend
- PMD vs Qlty Cloud
- NDepend vs Code Complexity
All code complexity analyzers comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update





