Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · AI Security Testing Tools

Mindgard vs Basilisk

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 6 checks side by side
Higher score Mindgard #3 in AI Security Testing Tools 9.0/10 Pricing on request ✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Mindgard
Basilisk #13 in AI Security Testing Tools 7.9/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 5 of 5 features Visit Basilisk

Mindgard leads on 0 checks, Basilisk on 0, and 6 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 6 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreMindgard · 9.0/10
  • Free planonly Basilisk

Mindgard scores higher on our rubric for ai security testing tools: 9.0 against 7.9 out of 10; our editors rank them #3 and #13.

On deployment mode, Mindgard gives you Both where Basilisk offers Self_hosted.

Mindgard is the better fit for enterprise AI risk and remediation programs. Basilisk is the better fit for open-source teams needing broad local testing.

  • Mindgard fits best

    Enterprise AI risk and remediation programs

  • Basilisk fits best

    Open-source teams needing broad local testing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Mindgard 9.0/10 Visit ↗ Basilisk 7.9/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.0 7.9
Ranking #3 in AI Security Testing Tools #13 in AI Security Testing Tools
Best for Enterprise AI risk and remediation programs Open-source teams needing broad local testing
Pricing model Paid Free
Starting price Pricing on request Free plan
Free plan Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Self-hosted Self-hosted, Desktop
Platforms Web Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Email, Phone, Docs Email
Integrations 6 integrations 12 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Mindgard 5/5 · Basilisk 5/5
Prompt injection tests ✓ ✓
Jailbreak tests ✓ ✓
Data leakage tests ✓ ✓
Unsafe output tests ✓ ✓
Custom test cases ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment mode Both Self_hosted
Our review
Pros
  • Automated red-team testing for models, agents, and applications
  • Runtime protection with policy enforcement and remediation workflows
  • Integrations across Burp Suite, CI/CD, SIEM, IDEs, and ticketing
  • Evolutionary prompt search covers injection, jailbreak, RAG, and leakage attacks
  • Works across Windows, macOS, Linux, hosted models, and local runtimes
  • Exports HTML, JSON, SARIF, Markdown, and PDF reports for security workflows
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting sales
  • Its listed platforms are limited to web and API
  • The broad feature set may exceed narrower testing needs
  • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to manage the operating environment
  • AGPL-3.0 licensing may require review before commercial adoption
  • Its broad module set may require security expertise to configure and interpret
Our verdict

Mindgard is an AI security platform for organizations assessing and defending models, agents, applications, and workflows. It supports AI attack-surface discovery, asset inventory, automated red-team testing, runtime protection, reporting,…

Read the review →

Basilisk is an open-source AI red teaming and LLM security testing framework for security researchers, penetration testers, and defensive teams. It runs on Windows, macOS, and Linux, and supports hosted and local language models through…

Read the review →
  1. MindgardAI Security Testing Tools 9.0Pricing on request
  2. BasiliskAI Security Testing Tools 7.9Free plan

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Mindgard — where it wins

    • Automated red-team testing for models, agents, and applications
    • Runtime protection with policy enforcement and remediation workflows
    • Integrations across Burp Suite, CI/CD, SIEM, IDEs, and ticketing

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales
    • Its listed platforms are limited to web and API
    • The broad feature set may exceed narrower testing needs
  • Basilisk — where it wins

    • Evolutionary prompt search covers injection, jailbreak, RAG, and leakage attacks
    • Works across Windows, macOS, Linux, hosted models, and local runtimes
    • Exports HTML, JSON, SARIF, Markdown, and PDF reports for security workflows

    Where it doesn't

    • Self-hosted deployment requires teams to manage the operating environment
    • AGPL-3.0 licensing may require review before commercial adoption
    • Its broad module set may require security expertise to configure and interpret
  • Mindgard9.0/10 · Pricing on request

    A broad AI risk platform spanning discovery, testing, protection, and remediation.

    Visit MindgardFull verdict →
  • Basilisk7.9/10 · Free plan

    Broad self-hosted AI security testing with evolutionary adversarial search and CI/CD support.

    Visit BasiliskFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update