Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience real numbers from our own analytics — open to see them
–Visitors
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · counted by iTechGuides's own first-party analytics, bots removed, every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Enterprise Content Management - Enterprise Software

Microsoft SharePoint vs Hyland Perceptive Content

  • Updated Sep 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 4 checks side by side

Microsoft SharePoint leads on 0 checks, Hyland Perceptive Content on 3, and 1 is even. Who comes out ahead on the 4 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreMicrosoft SharePoint · 7.8/10
  • Most featuresHyland Perceptive Content · 3 of 4

Microsoft SharePoint scores higher on our rubric for enterprise content management - enterprise software: 7.8 against 6.5 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #8.

Hyland Perceptive Content offers workflow automation; Microsoft SharePoint doesn't publish it. Hyland Perceptive Content offers records management; Microsoft SharePoint doesn't publish it. Hyland Perceptive Content offers retention policies; Microsoft SharePoint doesn't publish it.

Microsoft SharePoint is the better fit for organizations centered on Microsoft 365. Hyland Perceptive Content is the better fit for enterprise records and retention management.

  • Microsoft SharePoint fits best

    Organizations centered on Microsoft 365

  • Hyland Perceptive Content fits best

    Enterprise records and retention management

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Microsoft SharePoint 7.8/10 Visit ↗ Hyland Perceptive Content 6.5/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 7.8 6.5
Ranking #2 in Enterprise Content Management - Enterprise Software #8 in Enterprise Content Management - Enterprise Software
Best for Organizations centered on Microsoft 365 Enterprise records and retention management
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Not published Not published
Free plan — Not published
Free trial — —
Deployment Cloud, Mobile Cloud, Desktop, Mobile
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web, iOS, Android, Windows
Support Phone, Docs Community, Docs
Compliance SOC 2, 2FA GDPR
Integrations 6 integrations 3 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Microsoft SharePoint 0/4 · Hyland Perceptive Content 3/4
Workflow automation Not published ✓ (best)
Records management Not published ✓ (best)
Retention policies Not published ✓ (best)
Single sign-on Not published Not published
Specs
Deployment Not published Not published
Included storage Not published Not published
Maximum file size Not published Not published
Our review
Pros
  • Granular permissions reach sites, libraries, folders, and individual items
  • Version history supports document restoration and real-time coauthoring
  • OCR can index printed and handwritten text in documents and images
  • Automates retention policies, legal holds and disposition controls.
  • Combines full-text search, metadata indexing and version history.
  • Offers REST API and connectors, including Salesforce, Outlook and SAP.
Cons
  • Its listed plans bundle SharePoint with Microsoft 365 rather than offering it alone
  • Advanced identity and access management is limited to Business Premium
  • Microsoft 365 Copilot appears only in the listed Standard and Premium plans
  • Pricing requires contacting sales; no public plan prices are shown.
  • Integrations focus on Salesforce, Outlook and SAP, plus API and connectors.
  • Support channels listed are community and documentation.
Our verdict

SharePoint brings team and communication sites, document libraries, file sharing, and search into a cloud collaboration environment for organizations. It is suited to teams that need shared organizational content with managed access,…

Read the review →

Hyland Perceptive Content manages business-critical information from capture and indexing through workflow and disposition. Its records and information management capabilities make it a fit for mid-market and enterprise organizations that…

Read the review →
  1. Microsoft SharePointEnterprise Content Management - Enterprise Software 7.8Paid
  2. Hyland Perceptive ContentEnterprise Content Management - Enterprise Software 6.5Pricing on request

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Microsoft SharePoint — where it wins

    • Granular permissions reach sites, libraries, folders, and individual items
    • Version history supports document restoration and real-time coauthoring
    • OCR can index printed and handwritten text in documents and images

    Where it doesn't

    • Its listed plans bundle SharePoint with Microsoft 365 rather than offering it alone
    • Advanced identity and access management is limited to Business Premium
    • Microsoft 365 Copilot appears only in the listed Standard and Premium plans
  • Hyland Perceptive Content — where it wins

    • Automates retention policies, legal holds and disposition controls.
    • Combines full-text search, metadata indexing and version history.
    • Offers REST API and connectors, including Salesforce, Outlook and SAP.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales; no public plan prices are shown.
    • Integrations focus on Salesforce, Outlook and SAP, plus API and connectors.
    • Support channels listed are community and documentation.
  • Microsoft SharePoint7.8/10 · Paid

    A Microsoft-centric workspace for shared content, controlled access, and coauthoring.

    Visit siteFull verdict →
  • Hyland Perceptive Content6.5/10 · Pricing on request

    A records-focused content platform for controlled workflows, retention and legal holds.

    Visit HylandFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026

Last updated · How we research and update