Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Exposure Management Software

Microsoft Security Exposure Management vs TrollEye CTEM Platform

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Microsoft Security Exposure Management #1 in Exposure Management Software 9.4/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit site
TrollEye CTEM Platform #6 in Exposure Management Software 8.7/10 14-day trial Free trial✓ 4 of 4 features Visit TrollEye

Microsoft Security Exposure Management leads on 0 checks, TrollEye CTEM Platform on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreMicrosoft Security Exposure Management · 9.4/10
  • Free trialonly TrollEye CTEM Platform

Microsoft Security Exposure Management scores higher on our rubric for exposure management software: 9.4 against 8.7 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #6.

Microsoft Security Exposure Management is the better fit for microsoft-centric enterprise security teams. TrollEye CTEM Platform is the better fit for structured CTEM programs with clear pricing.

  • Microsoft Security Exposure Management fits best

    Microsoft-centric enterprise security teams

  • TrollEye CTEM Platform fits best

    Structured CTEM programs with clear pricing

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Microsoft Security Exposure Management 9.4/10 Visit ↗ TrollEye CTEM Platform 8.7/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.4 8.7
Ranking #1 in Exposure Management Software #6 in Exposure Management Software
Best for Microsoft-centric enterprise security teams Structured CTEM programs with clear pricing
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request $500/mo
Free plan Not checked yet —
Free trial — 14 days
Deployment Cloud Cloud
Integrations 19 integrations 7 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Microsoft Security Exposure Management 4/4 · TrollEye CTEM Platform 4/4
Attack path analysis ✓ ✓
Threat intelligence ✓ ✓
Asset criticality context ✓ ✓
Remediation workflows ✓ ✓
Specs
Prioritization model Contextual Contextual
Cloud asset coverage Broad Broad
Our review
Pros
  • Unifies exposure data across endpoints, identities, cloud, and external surfaces
  • Maps attack paths and prioritizes critical assets using contextual insights
  • Connects Microsoft security products with ServiceNow and major security platforms
  • Combines asset discovery, criticality scoring, and attack-path analysis
  • Provides role-based remediation workflows with Jira synchronization
  • Covers cloud, applications, identities, infrastructure, and third parties
Cons
  • Access is tied to qualifying Microsoft security licenses
  • Pricing requires contact with sales rather than published plan details
  • Third-party connectors are in preview and may become consumption-priced
  • No free plan; access begins at $995 per month
  • CTEM Growth and Professional rise to $2,995 and $8,995 monthly
  • Enterprise pricing is custom rather than published
Our verdict

Microsoft Security Exposure Management is a cloud-based security solution in the Microsoft Defender portal. It is designed for security operations teams, security architects, risk owners, and CISOs that need an enterprise-wide view of…

Read the review →

TrollEye CTEM Platform is a continuous threat exposure management system for security teams that need to discover assets, prioritize exposure, validate risk, coordinate remediation, and report outcomes. Its scope includes applications,…

Read the review →
  1. Microsoft Security Exposure ManagementExposure Management Software 9.4Pricing on request
  2. TrollEye CTEM PlatformExposure Management Software 8.714-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Microsoft Security Exposure Management — where it wins

    • Unifies exposure data across endpoints, identities, cloud, and external surfaces
    • Maps attack paths and prioritizes critical assets using contextual insights
    • Connects Microsoft security products with ServiceNow and major security platforms

    Where it doesn't

    • Access is tied to qualifying Microsoft security licenses
    • Pricing requires contact with sales rather than published plan details
    • Third-party connectors are in preview and may become consumption-priced
  • TrollEye CTEM Platform — where it wins

    • Combines asset discovery, criticality scoring, and attack-path analysis
    • Provides role-based remediation workflows with Jira synchronization
    • Covers cloud, applications, identities, infrastructure, and third parties

    Where it doesn't

    • No free plan; access begins at $995 per month
    • CTEM Growth and Professional rise to $2,995 and $8,995 monthly
    • Enterprise pricing is custom rather than published
  • Microsoft Security Exposure Management9.4/10 · Pricing on request

    A Microsoft-focused exposure platform for mapping, prioritizing, and remediating enterprise risk.

    Visit siteFull verdict →
  • TrollEye CTEM Platform8.7/10 · 14-day trial

    A structured CTEM platform with contextual prioritization, validation, and reporting.

    Visit TrollEyeFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update