Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Requirements Management Software

MathWorks Requirements Toolbox vs ReqView

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score MathWorks Requirements Toolbox #2 in Requirements Management Software 8.8/10 Paid ✓ 3 of 4 features Visit MathWorks
ReqView #11 in Requirements Management Software 7.6/10 Free plan · 14-day trial Free planFree trial✓ 4 of 4 features Visit ReqView

MathWorks Requirements Toolbox leads on 0 checks, ReqView on 1, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreMathWorks Requirements Toolbox · 8.8/10
  • Free planonly ReqView
  • Free trialonly ReqView
  • Most featuresReqView · 4 of 4

MathWorks Requirements Toolbox scores higher on our rubric for requirements management software: 8.8 against 7.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #11.

ReqView offers free plan; MathWorks Requirements Toolbox doesn't. On deployment options, ReqView gives you Hybrid where MathWorks Requirements Toolbox offers Cloud.

MathWorks Requirements Toolbox is the better fit for MATLAB and Simulink engineering teams. ReqView is the better fit for teams wanting free-to-paid requirements management.

  • MathWorks Requirements Toolbox fits best

    MATLAB and Simulink engineering teams

  • ReqView fits best

    Teams wanting free-to-paid requirements management

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature MathWorks Requirements Toolbox 8.8/10 Visit ↗ ReqView 7.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.8 7.6
Ranking #2 in Requirements Management Software #11 in Requirements Management Software
Best for MATLAB and Simulink engineering teams Teams wanting free-to-paid requirements management
Pricing model Paid Free plan + paid
Starting price — €440/user/yr
Free plan — ✓ (best)
Free trial — 14 days
Deployment Cloud, Desktop Cloud, Desktop
Platforms Web, Windows, macOS, Linux Web, Windows, macOS, Linux
Support Docs, Community Email, Tickets
Compliance ISO 27001 GDPR
Integrations 7 integrations 7 integrations
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market
Features MathWorks Requirements Toolbox 3/4 · ReqView 4/4
Requirements traceability ✓ ✓
Approval workflows Not checked yet ✓ (best)
Baseline support ✓ ✓
Version history ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment options Cloud Hybrid
Import and export Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel, IBM DOORS, IBM DOORS Next, ReqIF, Excel export MS Word, CSV, ReqIF import; DOCX, XLSX, PDF, HTML, CSV, ReqIF export
Our review
Pros
  • Links requirements to MATLAB code, models, tests, and test harnesses.
  • Imports from Word, Excel, IBM DOORS, DOORS Next, and ReqIF.
  • Provides traceability, impact analysis, status tracking, baselines, and reports.
  • Free plan supports limited editing and up to 150 objects
  • Traceability, verification, risks, approvals, baselines, and history
  • Runs on web, Windows, macOS, and Linux
Cons
  • Requires MATLAB as an add-on.
  • No free plan is available.
  • Individual-license plans may not fit larger team purchasing models.
  • PRO starts at €440 per user per year
  • FREE limits editing to one document and one custom attribute
  • Advanced integrations and controls require higher-tier plans
Our verdict

MathWorks Requirements Toolbox is a requirements engineering add-on for MATLAB and Simulink. It is designed for engineering teams that need to author structured requirements, connect them to implementation and verification artifacts, and…

Read the review →

ReqView is a requirements management application for software, hardware, and systems engineering projects. It organizes structured requirements documents with custom attributes, traceability links, verification and validation data, risks,…

Read the review →
  1. MathWorks Requirements ToolboxRequirements Management Software 8.8Paid
  2. ReqViewRequirements Management Software 7.6Free plan · 14-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • MathWorks Requirements Toolbox — where it wins

    • Links requirements to MATLAB code, models, tests, and test harnesses.
    • Imports from Word, Excel, IBM DOORS, DOORS Next, and ReqIF.
    • Provides traceability, impact analysis, status tracking, baselines, and reports.

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires MATLAB as an add-on.
    • No free plan is available.
    • Individual-license plans may not fit larger team purchasing models.

  • ReqView — where it wins

    • Free plan supports limited editing and up to 150 objects
    • Traceability, verification, risks, approvals, baselines, and history
    • Runs on web, Windows, macOS, and Linux

    Where it doesn't

    • PRO starts at €440 per user per year
    • FREE limits editing to one document and one custom attribute
    • Advanced integrations and controls require higher-tier plans
  • MathWorks Requirements Toolbox8.8/10 · Paid

    A focused requirements toolbox for teams working across MATLAB, Simulink, code, and tests.

    Visit MathWorksFull verdict →
  • ReqView7.6/10 · Free plan · 14-day trial

    A traceability-focused requirements tool with a useful free plan and costly paid entry.

    Visit ReqViewFull verdict →

More comparisons

All requirements management software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update