Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · Server Provisioning Software

MAAS vs xCAT

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 3 checks side by side
Higher score MAAS #2 in Server Provisioning Software 9.2/10 Free plan Free plan✓ 2 of 3 features Visit MAAS
xCAT #8 in Server Provisioning Software 8.2/10 Open source ✓ 0 of 3 features Visit xCAT

MAAS leads on 0 checks, xCAT on 0, and 3 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 3 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreMAAS · 9.2/10
  • Free planonly MAAS
  • Most featuresMAAS · 2 of 3

MAAS scores higher on our rubric for server provisioning software: 9.2 against 8.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #2 and #8.

MAAS is the better fit for bare-metal and VM provisioning with hardware control. xCAT is the better fit for large Linux and heterogeneous cluster provisioning.

  • MAAS fits best

    Bare-metal and VM provisioning with hardware control

  • xCAT fits best

    Large Linux and heterogeneous cluster provisioning

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature MAAS 9.2/10 Visit ↗ xCAT 8.2/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 9.2 8.2
Ranking #2 in Server Provisioning Software #8 in Server Provisioning Software
Best for Bare-metal and VM provisioning with hardware control Large Linux and heterogeneous cluster provisioning
Pricing model Free plan + paid Free
Starting price — Open source
Free plan ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Free trial — —
Deployment Self-hosted Self-hosted
Platforms Web, Linux Linux
Support Phone, Tickets, Community, Docs · 24/7 Email, Community, Docs
Built for Mid-market, Enterprise Mid-market, Enterprise
Features MAAS 2/3 · xCAT 0/3
Control panel support Not checked yet Not checked yet
Multi-tenant management ✓ (best) Not checked yet
API access ✓ (best) Not checked yet
Specs
Supported operating systems Both Not checked yet
Server types Both Not checked yet
Provisioning method Both Not checked yet
Managed server limit Not checked yet Not checked yet
Our review
Pros
  • Discovers, commissions, and provisions physical and virtual machines
  • Controls power, storage, networking, RAID, LVM, and PXE workflows
  • Offers REST API, CLI automation, custom images, and role-based permissions
  • Supports bare-metal, diskless, and statelite OS provisioning
  • Combines hardware discovery, firmware, power, and remote console controls
  • Provides hierarchical management, parallel dispatch, and a RESTful API
Cons
  • Requires a self-hosted deployment
  • Standalone support requires Ubuntu Pro for MAAS controllers
  • Advanced support costs $100 per managed machine annually
  • Requires a self-hosted management-node deployment
  • Its broad hardware and cluster scope may exceed smaller environments
  • IBM recommends Confluent as xCAT's successor
Our verdict

MAAS is Canonical’s open-source infrastructure management platform for provisioning and managing physical servers and virtual machines. It is designed for data-center operators, IT teams, private-cloud builders, HPC environments, edge…

Read the review →

xCAT is an open-source infrastructure automation toolkit for deploying, scaling, and managing bare-metal servers and virtual machines. It is aimed at high-performance computing clusters, AI environments, render farms, datacenters, and…

Read the review →
  1. MAASServer Provisioning Software 9.2Free plan
  2. xCATServer Provisioning Software 8.2Open source

Strengths and trade-offs

  • MAAS — where it wins

    • Discovers, commissions, and provisions physical and virtual machines
    • Controls power, storage, networking, RAID, LVM, and PXE workflows
    • Offers REST API, CLI automation, custom images, and role-based permissions

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires a self-hosted deployment
    • Standalone support requires Ubuntu Pro for MAAS controllers
    • Advanced support costs $100 per managed machine annually
  • xCAT — where it wins

    • Supports bare-metal, diskless, and statelite OS provisioning
    • Combines hardware discovery, firmware, power, and remote console controls
    • Provides hierarchical management, parallel dispatch, and a RESTful API

    Where it doesn't

    • Requires a self-hosted management-node deployment
    • Its broad hardware and cluster scope may exceed smaller environments
    • IBM recommends Confluent as xCAT's successor
  • MAAS9.2/10 · Free plan

    A capable open-source choice for teams managing bare-metal and virtual machine fleets.

    Visit MAASFull verdict →
  • xCAT8.2/10 · Open source

    A free, self-hosted toolkit for provisioning and managing large Linux and heterogeneous clusters.

    Visit xCATFull verdict →

More comparisons

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update