Head-to-head · Podcast Analytics Software
Listener vs Podscribe
Listener leads on 2 checks, Podscribe on 1, and 4 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 7 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.
Our verdict
- Highest scoreListener · 9.4/10
- Lowest starting priceListener · $49/mo
Listener scores higher on our rubric for podcast analytics software: 9.4 against 7.2 out of 10; our editors rank them #1 and #7.
Listener is cheaper to start at $49/mo against $250/mo. Podscribe offers ranking charts; Listener doesn't publish it. Listener offers retention metrics; Podscribe doesn't publish it.
Listener is the better fit for teams needing broad cross-platform analytics. Podscribe is the better fit for advertisers needing attribution and lift measurement.
- Listener fits best
Teams needing broad cross-platform analytics
- Podscribe fits best
Advertisers needing attribution and lift measurement
Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. We may earn a commission when you click some links. It never changes our verdict. How we rank.
Side by side
| Feature | Listener 9.4/10 Visit ↗ | Podscribe 7.2/10 Visit ↗ |
|---|---|---|
| At a glance | ||
| Editor score | 9.4 | 7.2 |
| Ranking | #1 in Podcast Analytics Software | #7 in Podcast Analytics Software |
| Best for | Teams needing broad cross-platform analytics | Advertisers needing attribution and lift measurement |
| Pricing model | Paid | Paid |
| Starting price | $49/mo (best) | $250/mo |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Free trial | — | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, Browser extension |
| Platforms | Web | Web |
| Integrations | 6 integrations | 11 integrations |
| Built for | Solo, Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise | Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise |
| Features Listener 4/5 · Podscribe 4/5 | ||
| Unique listeners | ✓ | ✓ |
| Audience demographics | ✓ | ✓ |
| Attribution tracking | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ranking charts | Not published | ✓ (best) |
| Retention metrics | ✓ (best) | Not published |
| Specs | ||
| Tracked shows | 1 shows | Not published |
| Data retention | Not published | 60 mo |
| Our review | ||
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Our verdict | Listener is a podcast analytics and intelligence platform for individual podcasters, podcast networks, agencies, studios, and teams. It brings together performance data from audio, video, and social platforms, with episode-level reporting,… Read the review → |
Podscribe is a measurement platform for advertisers, agencies, and publishers running podcast, streaming-audio, YouTube, CTV, video, and radio campaigns. Its core use case is connecting advertising exposure with outcomes through… Read the review → |
Strengths and trade-offs
Listener — where it wins
- Unified podcast, video, and social dashboards
- Episode, retention, demographic, and geographic insights
- AI analysis, collaboration, and role-based permissions
Where it doesn't
- No free plan
- Web-only access
- Annual billing across the listed plans
Podscribe — where it wins
- Connects ad exposure to site visits and purchases with multi-touch attribution
- Adds incrementality testing, reach, frequency, and audience-overlap reporting
- Covers podcast, streaming, CTV, video, YouTube, and radio campaigns
Where it doesn't
- Requires a $250 monthly platform fee before usage charges
- Impression-based pricing adds cost as campaign volume increases
- No standard free trial is offered
- Listener9.4/10 · From $49/mo (annual)
Broad podcast, video, and social analytics for teams managing audience growth.
Visit ListenerFull verdict → - Podscribe7.2/10 · From $250/mo
A broad measurement platform for advertisers that need attribution, lift testing, and cross-channel reporting.
Visit PodscribeFull verdict →
More comparisons
- Listener vs PodcastStats.com
- Listener vs Ausha
- Listener vs Podtrac
- Listener vs CoHost Prefix
- Listener vs Open Podcast
- Listener vs Magellan AI
- PodcastStats.com vs Podscribe
- Ausha vs Podscribe
All podcast analytics software comparisons → · Full ranking →
Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Sep 2026
Last updated · How we research and update






