Suggestions appear as you type. Use the up and down arrows to choose one and Enter to open it.

This page's audience our own tag's counts — open to see them
–Visits
–Page views
–Clicks to vendors
–Time on page
–Reading now
Clicks to vendors, by tool
  • –
Top countries
  • –
Devices
  • –

– · visits, page views and clicks counted by our own tag, which counts more than our checked analytics; every figure rounded down · how we count

Head-to-head · PACS Software

Konica Minolta Exa PACS vs MedDream PACS

  • Updated Oct 2026
  • Both researched from official sources
  • 5 checks side by side
Higher score Konica Minolta Exa PACS #7 in PACS Software 8.7/10 Pricing on request ✓ 4 of 4 features Visit Konica Minolta
MedDream PACS #8 in PACS Software 8.6/10 Pricing on request · 45-day trial Free trial✓ 4 of 4 features Visit MedDream

Konica Minolta Exa PACS leads on 0 checks, MedDream PACS on 0, and 5 are even. Who comes out ahead on the 5 yes/no, price and count checks where we have data for both products. The editor score weighs everything else too.

Our verdict

  • Highest scoreKonica Minolta Exa PACS · 8.7/10
  • Free trialonly MedDream PACS

Konica Minolta Exa PACS scores higher on our rubric for pacs software: 8.7 against 8.6 out of 10; our editors rank them #7 and #8.

On deployment, MedDream PACS gives you Hybrid where Konica Minolta Exa PACS offers Cloud.

Konica Minolta Exa PACS is the better fit for radiology groups seeking web-based imaging workflows. MedDream PACS is the better fit for providers needing broad DICOM interoperability.

  • Konica Minolta Exa PACS fits best

    Radiology groups seeking web-based imaging workflows

  • MedDream PACS fits best

    Providers needing broad DICOM interoperability

Advertiser disclosure: iTechGuides is reader-supported. Vendors can pay for top positions in our rankings and for a place on other products' pages, and we may earn a commission when you click some links. Bought places stand at the number bought; this page and our disclosure say so. Paying vendors may get a fuller, more detailed review from our editors, and that review can change their score. How we rank.

Side by side

Feature Konica Minolta Exa PACS 8.7/10 Visit ↗ MedDream PACS 8.6/10 Visit ↗
At a glance
Editor score 8.7 8.6
Ranking #7 in PACS Software #8 in PACS Software
Best for Radiology groups seeking web-based imaging workflows Providers needing broad DICOM interoperability
Pricing model Paid Paid
Starting price Pricing on request Pricing on request · 45-day trial
Free plan Not checked yet —
Free trial — 45 days
Deployment Cloud Cloud, Self-hosted
Platforms Web, iOS, Android Web
Support Email Email
Integrations 1 integrations 8 integrations
Built for Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise Small business, Mid-market, Enterprise
Features Konica Minolta Exa PACS 4/4 · MedDream PACS 4/4
Diagnostic viewer ✓ ✓
DICOM support ✓ ✓
Web viewer ✓ ✓
Mobile viewing ✓ ✓
Specs
Deployment Cloud Hybrid
Supported modalities PET, DBT, surgical video CR, CT, DX, ECG, ES, MG, MR, NM, OP, OT, PX, RF, RG, SC, US, XA
Our review
Pros
  • Zero-footprint diagnostic viewer uses server-side rendering.
  • Specialty viewing includes PET, DBT, and surgical video.
  • Worklists, STAT prioritization, reporting, peer review, and messaging are included.
  • DICOM 3.0 archiving with C-STORE, C-FIND, C-GET, and C-MOVE
  • Browser-based diagnostic viewing with support for many modalities
  • Integrates with EMR, HIS, RIS, and several PACS systems
Cons
  • Pricing requires contacting sales.
  • Email is the listed support channel.
  • AWS is the only named integration.
  • Pricing requires contacting MedDream
  • No free plan; access is offered through a 45-day demo license
  • HL7 messaging is optional rather than included by default
Our verdict

Konica Minolta Exa PACS is a picture archiving and communication system for radiology and imaging organizations. Its web-based diagnostic viewer uses server-side rendering, giving users access from web-enabled computers and mobile devices…

Read the review →

MedDream PACS is a DICOM 3.0-compliant system for storing, archiving, and managing medical images, paired with a browser-based viewer for image review and diagnostics. It is aimed at providers of different sizes that need to connect…

Read the review →
  1. Konica Minolta Exa PACSPACS Software 8.7Pricing on request
  2. MedDream PACSPACS Software 8.6Pricing on request · 45-day trial

Strengths and trade-offs

  • Konica Minolta Exa PACS — where it wins

    • Zero-footprint diagnostic viewer uses server-side rendering.
    • Specialty viewing includes PET, DBT, and surgical video.
    • Worklists, STAT prioritization, reporting, peer review, and messaging are included.

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting sales.
    • Email is the listed support channel.
    • AWS is the only named integration.

  • MedDream PACS — where it wins

    • DICOM 3.0 archiving with C-STORE, C-FIND, C-GET, and C-MOVE
    • Browser-based diagnostic viewing with support for many modalities
    • Integrates with EMR, HIS, RIS, and several PACS systems

    Where it doesn't

    • Pricing requires contacting MedDream
    • No free plan; access is offered through a 45-day demo license
    • HL7 messaging is optional rather than included by default
  • Konica Minolta Exa PACS8.7/10 · Pricing on request

    A web-based PACS combining diagnostic viewing with radiology workflow tools.

    Visit Konica MinoltaFull verdict →
  • MedDream PACS8.6/10 · Pricing on request · 45-day trial

    A broad DICOM PACS with web-based review and optional HL7 and reporting modules.

    Visit MedDreamFull verdict →

More comparisons

All PACS software comparisons → · Full ranking →

Reviewed by iTechGuides Editors · Editorial team · Updated Oct 2026

Last updated · How we research and update